End-to-end evaluation of perception systems for autonomous systems and applications

ABSTRACT

In various examples, an end-to-end perception evaluation system for autonomous and semi-autonomous machine applications may be implemented to evaluate how the accuracy or precision of outputs of machine learning models—such as deep neural networks (DNNs)—impact downstream performance of the machine when relied upon. For example, decisions computed by the system using ground truth output types may be compared to decisions computed by the system using the perception outputs. As a result, discrepancies in downstream decision making of the system between the ground truth information and the perception information may be evaluated to either aid in updating or retraining of the machine learning model or aid in generating more accurate or precise ground truth information.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/177,816, filed on Apr. 21, 2021, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

This application is related to U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 16/265,780, filed on Feb. 1, 2019, and U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 16/877,127, filed on May 18, 2020, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

Autonomous and semi-autonomous machines rely on perception to perform various operations—such as object and feature detection, classification, and tracking, planning, control, localization, actuation, and obstacle and collision avoidance. For example, the ability to safely detect, identify, and navigate in view of various static and dynamic objects, hazards, and/or features in the surrounding environment are critical tasks for any autonomous or semi-autonomous system. Due to the safety-critical nature of autonomous and semi-autonomous machine operations—such as in real-world environments with vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, etc.—perception systems are required to be accurate and precise while also satisfying various safety regulations or requirements. For example, in autonomous or semi-autonomous driving examples, an automotive safety integrity level (ASIL) may be associated with various tasks that rely on perception. As such, to satisfy the standards or requirements of the associated ASIL, the underlying machine learning models—such as deep neural networks (DNNs)—may be required to have a failure rate below one or more thresholds.

To test failure rates, accuracy, and/or precision of DNNs, traditional approaches rely on testing the outputs of the DNNs directly—e.g., without looking at the downstream effect of those outputs on autonomous or semi-autonomous machine performance. For example, some conventional systems may compute a key performance indicator (KPI) for various detection, classification, tracking, obstacle and collision avoidance, and/or other perception attributes—such as KPIs related to time to collision (TTC), freespace prediction accuracy, vehicle position prediction accuracy, velocity prediction accuracy, and/or vehicle classification accuracy. As a result, the accuracy or precision of the immediate predictions of the DNNs may be evaluated to aid in fine-tuning the DNNs prior to deployment. However, because these traditional approaches only analyze the outputs of the DNNs themselves, these systems do not take into account estimation errors (e.g., TTC estimation noise) and/or how the accuracy or precision of the DNNs—or lack thereof—affect downstream planning, control, and/or actuation of the autonomous or semi-autonomous machine. Accordingly, the KPIs used to evaluate the outputs of the DNNs—while resulting in seemingly more accurate or precise outputs—may not provide an accurate assessment of how the outputs of the DNNs, after processing by one or more downstream components, features, and/or functionality of the machine, translate to overall performance of the machine.

For example, while an existing TTC KPI may be measured by comparing TTC outputs of a camera-based DNN to ground truth outputs generated using RADAR, the resulting, validated TTC outputs may not perform as well in deployment as expected due to a lack of evaluation of how the TTC outputs are relied upon by the system as a whole. In such an example, TTC may be an indicator of danger in the longitudinal direction (e.g., an estimated amount of time until a forward or rearward collision will take place). Combined with distance from the ego-machine to a target object, TTC may be used to calculate the relative velocity between the ego-machine and the target object, which may be used in the planning/control modules for autonomous driving. Existing TTC KPIs measure TTC quality by calculating an urgency (e.g., the inverse of TTC) error—e.g., assuming RADAR urgency is the ground truth—and then using a threshold determined by a distance and a bounding shape size of the target object. This, however, does not provide a clear indication on how noisy the TTC estimation is in terms of how much it affects real-world driving.

SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to end-to-end perception evaluation systems for autonomous and semi-autonomous machine applications. Systems and methods are disclosed that not only evaluate the accuracy or precision of outputs of machine learning models—such as deep neural networks (DNNs)—but also evaluate how the outputs affect downstream performance of the machine when relied upon. For example, decisions made—or kinematic constraints imposed—by the system using ground truth output types may be compared to decisions made by the system using the perception outputs. As a result, discrepancies in downstream decision making of the system between the ground truth information and the perception information may be evaluated to either aid in updating or retraining of the machine learning model or aid in generating more accurate or precise ground truth information (e.g., in examples where the downstream decision making from the perception outputs are more desirable than the corresponding ground truth based decisions).

As an example, as an ego-machine traverses an environment, the ego-machine may capture sensor data over a period of time using one or more sensors of the machine. The sensor data—and/or perception outputs generated using the sensor data—may be stored in a driving log that may be accessed at a later time (e.g., in an offline mode) by a perception evaluation system. In some embodiments, the data stored in the driving log may be augmented with labels and/or other information to generate ground truth information corresponding to the captured sensor data and/or the perception outputs. This ground truth information may then be passed to a simulator to generate ground truth planning, control, actuation, obstacle avoidance, and/or other outputs based on the ground truth information. Additionally, perception information corresponding to perception outputs—e.g., generated using one or more machine learning models—from the processed sensor data may be passed to the simulator to generate perception planning, control, actuation, obstacle avoidance, and/or other outputs based on the perception information. The perception evaluation system may then evaluate the perception outputs in view of the ground truth outputs—or vice versa—to determine the differences in downstream effects of the perception and ground truth information on the ego-machine performance.

For example, where ground truth information indicates that the ego-machine is free to change into an adjacent lane, but the perception information indicates that the ego-machine should not change into the adjacent lane, the discrepancy may be evaluated to determine whether the underlying machine learning model should be updated or retrained to produce more accurate or precise outputs for downstream evaluation by the system. As such, and in contrast to conventional systems, the downstream effect of the perception outputs may be evaluated such that, even where the immediate outputs of the machine learning model may appear accurate or precise, inaccurate or imprecise outputs of planning, control, actuation, obstacle avoidance, and/or other tasks generated based on the perception outputs may be identified. Accordingly, the perception evaluation system may aid in generating machine learning models—such as DNNs—that are optimized for their contribution to the overall system performance.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present systems and methods for end-to-end evaluation of perception systems for autonomous machine applications are described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein:

FIG. 1 is an example data flow diagram of a perception evaluation system, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 2A is an example confusion matrix, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 2B is an example penalty matrix, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3 illustrates an example simulation of a control mode, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 4 illustrates focused control images, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing a method for computing one or more key performance indicators based at least in part on a determination of whether a fault is present in a perception system, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 6A is an illustration of an example autonomous vehicle, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 6B is an example of camera locations and fields of view for the example autonomous vehicle of FIG. 6A, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 6C is a block diagram of an example system architecture for the example autonomous vehicle of FIG. 6A, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 6D is a system diagram for communication between cloud-based server(s) and the example autonomous vehicle of FIG. 6A, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an example computing device suitable for use in implementing some embodiments of the present disclosure; and

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an example data center suitable for use in implementing some embodiments of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Systems and methods are disclosed related to end-to-end evaluation of perception systems for autonomous and semi-autonomous machine applications. Although the present disclosure may be described with respect to an example autonomous vehicle 600 (alternatively referred to herein as “vehicle 600” or “ego-machine 600,” an example of which is described with respect to FIGS. 6A-6D), this is not intended to be limiting. For example, the systems and methods described herein may be used by, without limitation, non-autonomous machines, semi-autonomous machines (e.g., in one or more adaptive driver assistance systems (ADAS)), piloted and un-piloted robots or robotic platforms, warehouse vehicles, off-road vehicles, vehicles coupled to one or more trailers, flying vessels, boats, shuttles, emergency response vehicles, motorcycles, electric or motorized bicycles, aircraft, construction vehicles, underwater craft, drones, and/or other vehicle types. In addition, although the present disclosure may be described with respect to evaluating perception systems for autonomous machine applications, this is not intended to be limiting, and the systems and methods described herein may be used for a variety of purposes including, by way of example and without limitation, for machine control, machine locomotion, machine driving, synthetic data generation, digital twinning, model training, perception, augmented reality, virtual reality, mixed reality, robotics, security and surveillance, autonomous or semi-autonomous machine applications, deep learning, environment simulation, data center processing, conversational AI, light transport simulation (e.g., ray-tracing, path tracing, etc.), collaborative content creation for 3D assets, cloud computing, and/or any other suitable applications and/or any other technology spaces where perception systems—or more generally, systems employing machine learning models—are used.

Disclosed embodiments may be comprised in a variety of different systems such as automotive systems (e.g., a control system for an autonomous or semi-autonomous machine, a perception system for an autonomous or semi-autonomous machine), systems implemented using a robot, aerial systems, medial systems, boating systems, smart area monitoring systems, systems for performing deep learning operations, systems for performing simulation and digital twin operations, systems implemented using an edge device, systems incorporating one or more virtual machines (VMs), systems for performing synthetic data generation operations, systems implemented at least partially in a data center, systems for performing conversational AI operations, systems for performing light transport simulation, systems for performing collaborative content creation for 3D assets, systems implemented at least partially using cloud computing resources, and/or other types of systems.

To address the deficiencies of conventional systems, systems and methods of the present disclosure evaluate quality of a perception system by evaluating the downstream effects of the underlying machine learning models—such as deep neural networks (DNNs)—on performance of an ego-machine. For example, as an ego-machine traverses an environment, one or more sensors of the ego-machine may generate sensor data, and this sensor data may be used by any number of machine learning models to compute any number of outputs. These outputs may be processed—e.g., via simulation—as inputs to one or more components of the ego-machine to generate downstream outputs. For example, the ego-machine may process these inputs from the machine learning model(s) to make planning, control, actuation, obstacle avoidance, and/or other decisions. In order to evaluate the decisions of the components of the ego-machine with respect to the outputs of the machine learning models, ground truth information may be generated that corresponds to the outputs of the machine learning models. For example, at a given time, the machine learning models may generate an output, and a corresponding ground truth output (e.g., before or after post-processing) may be generated that includes a presumably more accurate representation of the desired output of the machine learning models. This ground truth output may be processed—e.g., via a same simulation type as the perception outputs—as inputs to one or more components of the ego-machine to generate downstream outputs. The downstream outputs may similarly correspond to planning, control, actuation, obstacle avoidance, and/or other decisions of the ego-machine. The perception-based decisions and the ground truth based decisions may then be compared to evaluate the performance of the ego-machine when relying on the perception outputs as compared to the performance of the ego-machine when relying on the ground truth outputs. In this way, the impact of the underlying machine learning models of the perception system of the ego-machine may be more accurately evaluated for their impact on the overall performance of the system, rather than solely evaluating the accuracy or precision of the immediate outputs of the machine learning models. In some embodiments, such as where the perception-based outputs result in more accurate or reliable decisions, the ground truth information may be updated or refined to assist in more accurate or precise comparisons in future testing and evaluation.

As such, in embodiments, as an ego-machine travels along a roadway, the ego-machine may capture sensor data of a driving environment for a period of time and store the sensor data in a driving log. Sensor data stored in the driving log may include, but is not limited to, sensor data captured from one or more camera sensors, LiDAR sensors, RADAR sensors, and/or other sensors of the ego-machine capable of sensing the driving environment. For example, for every frame or period of time when sensor data is recorded, the ego-machine may capture sensor data representative of a field of view or sensor field of the sensor. This sensor data may then be processed using one or more machine learning models to generate perception outputs corresponding to the sensor data. For example, with respect to object detection, the sensor data may be processed by a machine learning model trained to compute object detection outputs—e.g., bounding shapes corresponding to detected objects.

To generate ground truth data, the sensor data used to generate the perception outputs (and/or other sensor data, such as where a first sensor type is used for perception and another sensor type is used for ground truth generation) may be augmented with labels and/or annotations to generate ground truth information (e.g., pseudo-ground truth) corresponding to the captured sensor data of the driving environment for the period of time. For example, an annotator, an annotation program, and/or another technique may be used to generate labels or annotations corresponding to the sensor data to be used as ground truth. The labels or annotations may be applied to sensor data (e.g., representing images, point clouds, depth maps, projection images (e.g., range images), and/or other sensor data representations), and may include, without limitation, bounding shapes (e.g., including encoded classification, instance, appearance, and/or other information), lines (e.g., corresponding to poles, signs, lane dividers, road boundaries, intersections, pedestrian walkways, bicycle lanes, etc.), pose information, velocity, acceleration, and/or speed information, trajectory information, etc. In some examples, the ground truth information may be generated using one or more computer vision algorithms and/or machine learning models—e.g., DNNs—such as computer vision algorithms or machine learning models trained and/or validated to generate outputs that may be used as ground truth. In such an example, outputs of a machine learning model under test may be evaluated against outputs of a previously validated machine learning model. In further embodiments, sensor data stored in the driving log may be, additionally or alternatively, augmented via sensor fusion, such as by combining image, LiDAR, RADAR, and/or other sensor data types to provide additional or denser information—e.g., three dimensional (3D) information, such as precision and velocity. In some embodiments, the ground truth information may be combined with ego-motion sensor data captured by the ego-machine, such as inertial measurement unit (IMU) data, global positioning system (GPS) data, and/or controller area network (CAN) data. In at least one embodiment, any of the data may be converted into an input format suitable for a simulator.

The perception information and the associated ground truth information may then be used by one or more components of the ego-machine—such as planning, control, obstacle avoidance, actuations, and/or other components—to simulate decision making of the system using the perception information versus using the ground truth information. In some embodiments, the simulator—which may include hardware-in-the-loop, software-in-the-loop, person-in-the-loop, and/or simulation components—may perform a forward simulation using the ground truth information to compute one or more first outputs and a forward simulation using the perception information to compute one or more second outputs. For example, the simulator may output a control mode (e.g., simple cruise control, adaptive cruise control (ACC) comfort braking, and ACC safe braking) and/or one or more kinematic constraints corresponding to the perception information and separately corresponding to the ground truth information.

In some embodiments, the forward simulation may be executed using any available control model—such as, a behavior planner, an automatic emergency braking (AEB) model, a collision avoidance model (e.g., safety force field), and/or other type of control model. By way of example, the simulator may perform a forward simulation of a safety force field model for each of the ground truth information and the perception information. The safety force field is described, as a non-limiting example, in U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 16/265,780, filed on Feb. 1, 2019, and U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 16/877,127, filed on May 18, 2020, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. In this forward simulation, it may be assumed at each frame that each detected vehicle in the driving environment may execute a respective safety procedure, such as where each actor brakes to rapidly decelerate to a stop. Based on this simulation, the simulator may output a set of controls and/or kinematic constraints for the ego-machine based on to the outcomes of implementing one or more safety procedures or another set of controls and/or kinematic constraints. For example, a first set of constraints may be generated based on the forward simulation using the ground truth information and a second set of constraints based on the forward simulation using the perception information.

Subsequently, in some embodiments, the perception evaluation system may compare the ground truth control and/or kinematic constraint outputs against the perception control and/or kinematic constraint outputs of a control model to detect issues or failures in the perception system. When constraints output from the ground truth information diverge from constraints output from the perception information, it may be determined that the perception system executing the machine learning model(s) has an issue, or has failed. For example, in a safety force field simulation, a failure may be determined if the perception constraint outputs would result in the ego-machine colliding with a vehicle in the simulation, whereas the ground truth constraint outputs would not, or vice versa. In some embodiments, the perception evaluation system may determine a failure when a difference between pixel values in a control image generated using the ground truth information and the pixel values in a control image generated using the perception information differ by more than a threshold. The control image may, in embodiments, include encoded pixel values corresponding to whether lateral (e.g., steering controls) and/or longitudinal (e.g., accelerating or braking) control actions are acceptable or safe, or whether the control actions are unacceptable or unsafe.

The issues or failures of the perception system may be evaluated using one or more KPIs. For example, the KPI value may correspond to a mean distance between failures (MDBF). In such an example, the simulator may process the ground truth information and the perception information over a period of time, and evaluate the MDBF, where a failure in the MDBF may be indicated by a threshold being exceeded with respect to the comparison of the control images. As such, the perception evaluation system may compare control outputs—or control images corresponding thereto—from the simulations and provide an indication or count of failed frames. In some embodiments, when two or more failed frames occur within a time period (e.g., 2 seconds), the failure may be counted as a failure event. Accordingly, a KPI may be calculated based on the count of failed frames and/or the count of failure events. The KPI may correspond to a MDBF or a mean time between failures (MTBF) (e.g., MTBF=0.775 minutes).

In some embodiments, the perception evaluation system may output a confusion matrix to indicate the quality of a control model, such as a behavior planner. The behavior planner may, for a non-limiting example, have three control modes—simple cruise control (CC), adaptive cruise control (ACC) comfort braking, and ACC safe braking. To generate the confusion matrix, the system may analyze the ground truth control outputs and the perception control outputs to determine a ratio of how often the ground truth control outputs and the perception control outputs result in the same control mode. For example, the system may determine that the ground truth information and the perception information both result in the behavior planner selecting CC in 92% of forward simulations. In further embodiments, a penalty may be assigned to misclassification results. These penalties, for example, may then be used to compute a control mode error designed to demonstrate the quality of the behavior planner.

Based on these comparisons, the perception evaluation system may evaluate the quality of the perception information captured by perception system of the ego-machine and how the captured perception information affects the real-world driving experience. Advantageously, developers may better know where to focus their efforts to make aspects of the perception system more robust and/or accurate. For example, although the perception system may occasionally mislabel a sedan as a mini-van, the perception evaluation system may determine that the actual effect on the real-world driving experience is negligible. Accordingly, developers may focus their attention elsewhere rather than focusing on training the underlying machine learning model(s) to improve accuracy with respect to labeling sedans as sedans and minivans as minivans.

With reference to FIG. 1, FIG. 1 is an example data flow diagram of a perception evaluation system 100, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. It should be understood that this and other arrangements described herein are set forth only as examples. Other arrangements and elements (e.g., machines, interfaces, functions, orders, groupings of functions, etc.) may be used in addition to or instead of those shown, and some elements may be omitted altogether. Further, many of the elements described herein are functional entities that may be implemented as discrete or distributed components or in conjunction with other components, and in any suitable combination and location. Various functions described herein as being performed by entities may be carried out by hardware, firmware, and/or software. For instance, various functions may be carried out by a processor executing instructions stored in memory. In some embodiments, the system 100 may be implemented using similar components, features, and/or functionality as that of example autonomous vehicle 600 of FIGS. 6A-6D, example computing device 700 of FIG. 7, and/or example data center 800 of FIG. 8.

The perception evaluation system 100 of FIG. 1 includes evaluator 102, control model(s) 104, sensor data 110, data storage 120, data processor 130, ego-properties 140, simulator(s) 150, control(s) 160, analyzer 170, and failure(s) 180. In some embodiments, the sensor data 110 may include, without limitation, sensor data from any of the sensors of the vehicle 600 (and/or other vehicles, machines, or objects, such as robotic devices, water vessels, aircraft, trains, construction equipment, VR systems, AR systems, etc., in some examples). For a non-limiting example, such as where the sensor(s) generating the sensor data 110 are disposed on or otherwise associated with the vehicle 600, the sensor data 110 may include the data generated by, without limitation, global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) sensor(s) 658 (e.g., Global Positioning System sensor(s)), RADAR sensor(s) 660, ultrasonic sensor(s) 662, LIDAR sensor(s) 664, inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor(s) 666 (e.g., accelerometer(s), gyroscope(s), magnetic compass(es), magnetometer(s), etc.), microphone(s) 696, stereo camera(s) 668, wide-view camera(s) 670 (e.g., fisheye cameras), infrared camera(s) 672, surround camera(s) 674 (e.g., 360 degree cameras), long-range and/or mid-range camera(s) 698, speed sensor(s) 644 (e.g., for measuring the speed of the vehicle 600), and/or other sensor types.

In some embodiments, as the vehicle 600 drives along a roadway, one or more sensors of the vehicle 600 may capture sensor data 110 of a driving environment corresponding to the roadway for a period of time and store the sensor data 110 in data storage 120. For example, for every frame or period of time when sensor data 110 is recorded, the vehicle 600 may capture sensor data 110 representative of a field of view or sensory field of the one or more sensors. Additionally, or alternatively, the data storage 120 may include ground truth information, map data (e.g., the HD map 622 of FIG. 6C), annotation information, and/or other information to aid operations of the vehicle 600. The sensor data 110 may then be provided to and processed by the data processor 130, which may include one or more machine learning models to generate the ego-properties 140 (e.g., perception outputs) corresponding to the sensor data 110. The ego-properties 140 may include, at least, object detection outputs (e.g., bounding shapes corresponding to detected objects), hazard detection outputs, ego-motion estimates, lane detection outputs, and/or other outputs. As discussed further herein, these ego-properties 140 may be passed to, and processed by, the simulator 150 of the control model 104 along with the ground truth data.

In some embodiments, ground truth data may be generated using the sensor data 110. The sensor data 110 may be augmented with labels and/or annotations to generate ground truth information (e.g., pseudo-ground truth), which may be stored in the data storage 120. For example, an annotator (e.g., a user), an annotation program, and/or another annotation technique may access the sensor data 110 stored in the data storage 120 and label, tag, and/or otherwise annotate portions of the sensor data 110 to be used as ground truth data and store the annotated version of the sensor data 110 as ground truth data in the data storage 120. In some embodiments, the labels or annotations may be applied to one or more portions of the sensor data 110 representing images, point clouds, depth maps, projection images, range images, and/or other representations. The labels or annotations applied to the sensor data 110 may include, without limitation, bounding shapes, encoded classifications, instance information, appearance information, pose information, velocity, acceleration, and/or speed information, trajectory information, and/or lines that may correspond to poles, signs, lane dividers, road boundaries, intersections, pedestrian walkways, bicycle lanes, etc. In some examples, the data storage 120 may include, or have access to, one or more computer vision algorithms and/or machine learning models—e.g., DNNs—such as computer vision algorithms or machine learning models trained and/or validated to generate outputs that may be used as ground truth. In further embodiments, sensor data 110 stored in the data storage 120 may be, additionally or alternatively, augmented via sensor fusion, such as by combining image, LiDAR, RADAR, and/or other sensor data types to provide additional or denser information—e.g., three dimensional (3D) information, such as precision and velocity. In some embodiments, the ground truth information may be combined with the sensor data 110 corresponding to ego-motion captured by the vehicle 600, such as inertial measurement unit (IMU) data, global positioning system (GPS) data, and/or controller area network (CAN) data. In some embodiments, any of the sensor data 110 or the data maintained in the data storage 120 may be converted by the data processor 130 into an input format suitable for the simulator 150.

Perception information—such as the sensor data 110 and one or more of the ego-properties 140—and the associated ground truth information may be provided to the control model 104 in order to simulate, by the simulator 150, decision making of the control model 104 using the perception information and using the ground truth data. The control model 104 may include, without limitation, one or more models/components for planning, control, obstacle avoidance, actuation, and/or any other model for controlling the vehicle 600. In some embodiments, the simulator 150—which may include hardware-in-the-loop, software-in-the-loop, person-in-the-loop, and/or one or more additional simulation components—may perform a forward simulation using the ground truth data to compute one or more first controls 160 and a forward simulation using the perception information to compute one or more second controls 160. For example, the simulator 150 may output one or more controls 160 that may correspond to a control mode for simple cruise control, adaptive cruise control (ACC) comfort braking, and ACC safe braking and/or one or more kinematic constraints corresponding to the perception information and separately corresponding to the ground truth information.

As an example, and with respect to FIG. 2A, FIG. 2A is an example confusion matrix 200A, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, the perception evaluation system 100 may output a confusion matrix 200A to indicate the quality of a control model, such as the control model 104 of FIG. 1. For example, a control model for a behavior planner may, for a non-limiting example, have three control modes—simple cruise control (CC) 202A/B, adaptive cruise control (ACC) comfort braking 204A/B, and ACC safe braking 206A/B. To generate the confusion matrix 200A, the system may analyze ground truth control outputs—such as CC 202A, ACC 204A, and ACC safe braking 206A—and perception control outputs—such as CC 202B, ACC 204B, and ACC safe braking 206B—to determine a ratio of how often the ground truth control outputs and the perception control outputs result in the same control mode. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 2A, the system may determine that in 92% of forward simulations the behavior planner selects CC 202A using the ground truth information and CC 202B using the perception information.

In further embodiments, a penalty may be assigned to misclassification results (see, FIG. 2B). These penalties, for example, may then be used to compute a control mode error designed to demonstrate the quality of the behavior planner. By way of example, to convert the confusion matrix 200 of FIG. 2A to a consolidated number, the system may apply penalty matrix 200B of FIG. 2B to (mis-)classification results and may calculate a single averaged penalty value, or control mode error. The penalty matrix 200B is designed to reflect the magnitude of a misclassification—e.g., a misclassification between adjacent modes is penalized less (e.g., 1) than misclassification between non-adjacent modes (e.g., 3). For example, as illustrated in FIG. 2B, where an estimated mode is ACC safety braking 212B and the true mode is CC 208A, the penalty is greatest at 3. This misclassification may receive the greatest penalty because of the potential severity of the impact on the driving experience. For example, if the vehicle 600 enters ACC safety braking (which may include extreme braking profiles) when in fact the surrounding environment indicates that CC (which may include less extreme braking profiles) is warranted, then the impact on the driving experience may be severe.

Referring again to FIG. 1, in some embodiments, the analyzer 170 may receive and compare the controls 160 corresponding to ground truth control and/or kinematic constraint outputs against the controls 160 corresponding to perception control and/or kinematic constraint outputs of the control model 104 to detect issues or failures in the perception system of the vehicle 600. When the controls 160 corresponding to ground truth control and/or kinematic constraint outputs diverge from the controls 160 corresponding to perception control and/or kinematic constraint outputs, it may be determined that the perception system of the vehicle 600 has an issue, or has failed and the analyzer 170 may output one or more failures 180. For example, in a safety force field simulation, the failure 180 may be determined if the controls 160 corresponding to perception control and/or kinematic constraint outputs would result in the vehicle 600 colliding with a vehicle in the simulation, whereas the controls 160 corresponding to ground truth control and/or kinematic constraint outputs would not, or vice versa. In some embodiments, the analyzer 170 may determine the failure 180 when a difference between pixel values in a control image generated using the ground truth information and the pixel values in a control image generated using the perception information differ by more than a threshold. The control image may, in embodiments, include encoded pixel values corresponding to whether lateral (e.g., steering controls) and/or longitudinal (e.g., accelerating or braking) control actions are acceptable or safe, or whether the control actions are unacceptable or unsafe.

As an example, and with respect to FIG. 3, FIG. 3 illustrates an example simulation of a control mode, such as safety force field, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, the simulation may assume that all detected actors in an environment (except for the ego-machine 310A/B/C, which may correspond to vehicle 600, in embodiments) executes their respective safety procedure—e.g., braking and slowing their lateral movement to a stop. One or more ground truth projections 312 A/B/C/D (collectively referred to herein as “ground truth projections 312”) and one or more estimation projections 314 A/B/C/D (collectively referred to herein as “estimation projections 314”) of each object's safety procedure—in 2D or 3D—from a current location may represent a claimed set of points in space (e.g., world-space) that objects and/or actors in the environment may occupy if the actors were to execute their safety procedure at the current time. Further, for each control pair of lateral (e.g., indicated by steering decisions) and longitudinal (e.g., indicated by accelerating or braking) acceleration values, the simulation may compute a claimed set of points that would result for the ego-machine 310, if such control was applied for a reaction time, followed by the safety procedure. These lateral and/or longitudinal controls followed by the safety procedure may be used to generate a claimed set of points for the ego-machine 310, and the simulator may evaluate whether a claimed set of points of the ego-machine 310 would intersect with any of the claimed sets of points of the surrounding actors for each lateral/longitudinal control decision. This process may be repeated for both objects detected using perception estimation, as in column 302, and for objects represented in the ground truth data, as in column 306.

The lateral/longitudinal pairs that result in a collision between one or more claimed sets of points of objects and a corresponding claimed set of points of the ego-machine may be indicated by pixel values 316A/B/C. The resulting control images 306A/B/C may indicate lateral and/or longitudinal acceleration controls that are acceptable (e.g., do not result in collisions of claimed sets) or unacceptable (e.g., result in at least one collision of claimed sets). As such, for each frame or time step, a ground truth control image 306A and a perception estimation control image 306C may be generated by the simulator, and the evaluator of the system may evaluate the differences between the two. In some embodiments, to perform the comparison, the system may compute the shortest distance between a pixel in the ground truth control image 306A and a same colored pixel in the perception estimation control image 306C, and/or vice versa, and may sum the values together as the error for a given pixel. As such, resulting comparison control image 306B may represent the pixel values 316B that are different between the pixel values 316A of the ground truth control image 306A and the pixel values 316C of the perception estimation control image 306C. This difference (e.g., pixel values 316B) may represent the error and/or failure that may be important to the system, as the error may indicate control decisions that may be allowable but should not be allowed, or that may not be allowable but should be allowed. To classify error between the ground truth control image 306A and perception estimation control image 306C, a threshold may be used. For example, the threshold correspond to a number of pixel values 316B in the comparison control image 306B, such that when a threshold number of pixel values 316B are present in the comparison control image 306B, an error, fault, or failure may be detected. Once detected, any frames within some time period (e.g., two seconds) may be determined to correspond to the same error, and any frames corresponding a time after the time period may be determined to correspond to a new and separate error. In such an example, the error may be used to calculate one or more KPIs, such as mean distance between failures (MDBF) and/or mean time between failures (MTBF).

In some embodiments, to reduce compute by the system, and improve runtime performance, one or more filters may be applied to remove certain portions of the data from consideration. For example, FIG. 4 shows focused control images 402A/B/C (collectively referred to herein as “focused control images 402”). The focused control images 402 include focused regions of pixel values 412A/B/C (collectively referred to herein as “focused regions of pixel values 412”) that may be evaluated by the system to calculate one or more KPIs—similar to the methods described in relation to FIG. 3—after filtering, truncation, temporal smoothing, and accounting for ROIs, and/or margin pixels. To generate the focused regions of pixel values 412 in these focused control images 402, objects and/or actors in the environment that are further than a predefined distance (e.g., 100 meters) away from ego-machine 410A/B/C (collectively referred to herein as “ego-machine 410”) may be ignored, objects not in the path of the ego-machine 410 may be ignored (e.g., objects not in an ego-lane and/or one or more immediately adjacent lanes), objects with velocity predictions below a confidence threshold may be ignored, and/or objects that are truncated or cropped within one or more sensor data representations may be ignored.

Referring again to FIG. 1, the issues or failures of the perception system may be evaluated using one or more KPIs. For example, the KPI value may correspond to a mean distance between failures 180 (MDBF). In such an example, the simulator 150 may process the ground truth information and the perception information over a period of time, and evaluate the MDBF, where the failure 180 in the MDBF may be indicated by a threshold being exceeded with respect to the comparison of the control images. As such, the analyzer 170 may compare controls 160 output from the simulation 150 and provide an indication or count of failed frames. In some embodiments, when two or more failed frames occur within a time period, the failure 180 may be counted as a failure event. Accordingly, a KPI may be calculated based on the count of failed frames and/or the count of failure events. The KPI may correspond to a MDBF or a mean time between failures 180 (MTBF).

Now referring to FIG. 5, each block of method 500, described herein, comprises a computing process that may be performed using any combination of hardware, firmware, and/or software. For instance, various functions may be carried out by a processor executing instructions stored in memory. The method 500 may also be embodied as computer-usable instructions stored on computer storage media. The method 500 may be provided by a standalone application, a service or hosted service (standalone or in combination with another hosted service), or a plug-in to another product, to name a few. In addition, method 500 is described, by way of example, with respect to the perception evaluation system 100 of FIG. 1. However, the method 500 may additionally or alternatively be executed by any one system, or any combination of systems, including, but not limited to, those described herein.

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing a method 500 for computing one or more key performance indicators based at least in part on a determination of whether a fault is present in a perception system, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. The method 500, at block B502, includes receiving ground truth data corresponding to a time and perception data corresponding to the time, the perception data generated based at least in part on one or more machine learning models processing sensor data. For example, at a given time, the machine learning model(s) may generate an output, and a corresponding ground truth output may be generated that includes a presumably more accurate representation of the output from the machine learning model(s).

The method 500, at block B504, includes computing, based at least in part on a first forward simulation using the ground truth data, one or more first outputs. For example, the simulator—which may include hardware-in-the-loop, software-in-the-loop, person-in-the-loop, and/or simulation components—may perform a forward simulation using the ground truth information to compute one or more first outputs.

The method 500, at block B506, includes computing, based at least in part on a second forward simulation using the perception data, one or more second outputs. For example, the simulator may perform another forward simulation using the perception information to compute one or more second outputs.

The method 500, at block B508, includes determining whether a fault is present based at least in part on comparing the one or more first outputs to the one or more second outputs. For example, the perception evaluation system may compare the ground truth control and/or kinematic constraint outputs against the perception control and/or kinematic constraint outputs of a control model to detect issues or failures in the perception system.

The method 500, at block B510, includes computing one or more key performance indicators (KPIs) based at least in part on the determination of whether the fault is present. For example, a KPI may be calculated based on the count of failed frames and/or the count of failure events. The KPI may correspond to a MDBF or a mean time between failures (MTBF), in embodiments.

Example Autonomous Vehicle

FIG. 6A is an illustration of an example autonomous vehicle 600, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. The autonomous vehicle 600 (alternatively referred to herein as the “vehicle 600”) may include, without limitation, a passenger vehicle, such as a car, a truck, a bus, a first responder vehicle, a shuttle, an electric or motorized bicycle, a motorcycle, a fire truck, a police vehicle, an ambulance, a boat, a construction vehicle, an underwater craft, a drone, a vehicle coupled to a trailer, and/or another type of vehicle (e.g., that is unmanned and/or that accommodates one or more passengers). Autonomous vehicles are generally described in terms of automation levels, defined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), a division of the US Department of Transportation, and the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) “Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles” (Standard No. J3016-201806, published on Jun. 15, 2018, Standard No. J3016-201609, published on Sep. 30, 2016, and previous and future versions of this standard). The vehicle 600 may be capable of functionality in accordance with one or more of Level 3-Level 5 of the autonomous driving levels. For example, the vehicle 600 may be capable of conditional automation (Level 3), high automation (Level 4), and/or full automation (Level 5), depending on the embodiment.

The vehicle 600 may include components such as a chassis, a vehicle body, wheels (e.g., 2, 4, 6, 8, 18, etc.), tires, axles, and other components of a vehicle. The vehicle 600 may include a propulsion system 650, such as an internal combustion engine, hybrid electric power plant, an all-electric engine, and/or another propulsion system type. The propulsion system 650 may be connected to a drive train of the vehicle 600, which may include a transmission, to enable the propulsion of the vehicle 600. The propulsion system 650 may be controlled in response to receiving signals from the throttle/accelerator 652.

A steering system 654, which may include a steering wheel, may be used to steer the vehicle 600 (e.g., along a desired path or route) when the propulsion system 650 is operating (e.g., when the vehicle is in motion). The steering system 654 may receive signals from a steering actuator 656. The steering wheel may be optional for full automation (Level 5) functionality.

The brake sensor system 646 may be used to operate the vehicle brakes in response to receiving signals from the brake actuators 648 and/or brake sensors.

Controller(s) 636, which may include one or more system on chips (SoCs) 604 (FIG. 6C) and/or GPU(s), may provide signals (e.g., representative of commands) to one or more components and/or systems of the vehicle 600. For example, the controller(s) may send signals to operate the vehicle brakes via one or more brake actuators 648, to operate the steering system 654 via one or more steering actuators 656, to operate the propulsion system 650 via one or more throttle/accelerators 652. The controller(s) 636 may include one or more onboard (e.g., integrated) computing devices (e.g., supercomputers) that process sensor signals, and output operation commands (e.g., signals representing commands) to enable autonomous driving and/or to assist a human driver in driving the vehicle 600. The controller(s) 636 may include a first controller 636 for autonomous driving functions, a second controller 636 for functional safety functions, a third controller 636 for artificial intelligence functionality (e.g., computer vision), a fourth controller 636 for infotainment functionality, a fifth controller 636 for redundancy in emergency conditions, and/or other controllers. In some examples, a single controller 636 may handle two or more of the above functionalities, two or more controllers 636 may handle a single functionality, and/or any combination thereof.

The controller(s) 636 may provide the signals for controlling one or more components and/or systems of the vehicle 600 in response to sensor data received from one or more sensors (e.g., sensor inputs). The sensor data may be received from, for example and without limitation, global navigation satellite systems sensor(s) 658 (e.g., Global Positioning System sensor(s)), RADAR sensor(s) 660, ultrasonic sensor(s) 662, LIDAR sensor(s) 664, inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor(s) 666 (e.g., accelerometer(s), gyroscope(s), magnetic compass(es), magnetometer(s), etc.), microphone(s) 696, stereo camera(s) 668, wide-view camera(s) 670 (e.g., fisheye cameras), infrared camera(s) 672, surround camera(s) 674 (e.g., 360 degree cameras), long-range and/or mid-range camera(s) 698, speed sensor(s) 644 (e.g., for measuring the speed of the vehicle 600), vibration sensor(s) 642, steering sensor(s) 640, brake sensor(s) (e.g., as part of the brake sensor system 646), and/or other sensor types.

One or more of the controller(s) 636 may receive inputs (e.g., represented by input data) from an instrument cluster 632 of the vehicle 600 and provide outputs (e.g., represented by output data, display data, etc.) via a human-machine interface (HMI) display 634, an audible annunciator, a loudspeaker, and/or via other components of the vehicle 600. The outputs may include information such as vehicle velocity, speed, time, map data (e.g., the HD map 622 of FIG. 6C), location data (e.g., the vehicle's 600 location, such as on a map), direction, location of other vehicles (e.g., an occupancy grid), information about objects and status of objects as perceived by the controller(s) 636, etc. For example, the HMI display 634 may display information about the presence of one or more objects (e.g., a street sign, caution sign, traffic light changing, etc.), and/or information about driving maneuvers the vehicle has made, is making, or will make (e.g., changing lanes now, taking exit 34B in two miles, etc.).

The vehicle 600 further includes a network interface 624 which may use one or more wireless antenna(s) 626 and/or modem(s) to communicate over one or more networks. For example, the network interface 624 may be capable of communication over LTE, WCDMA, UMTS, GSM, CDMA2000, etc. The wireless antenna(s) 626 may also enable communication between objects in the environment (e.g., vehicles, mobile devices, etc.), using local area network(s), such as Bluetooth, Bluetooth LE, Z-Wave, ZigBee, etc., and/or low power wide-area network(s) (LPWANs), such as LoRaWAN, SigFox, etc.

FIG. 6B is an example of camera locations and fields of view for the example autonomous vehicle 600 of FIG. 6A, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. The cameras and respective fields of view are one example embodiment and are not intended to be limiting. For example, additional and/or alternative cameras may be included and/or the cameras may be located at different locations on the vehicle 600.

The camera types for the cameras may include, but are not limited to, digital cameras that may be adapted for use with the components and/or systems of the vehicle 600. The camera(s) may operate at automotive safety integrity level (ASIL) B and/or at another ASIL. The camera types may be capable of any image capture rate, such as 60 frames per second (fps), 120 fps, 240 fps, etc., depending on the embodiment. The cameras may be capable of using rolling shutters, global shutters, another type of shutter, or a combination thereof. In some examples, the color filter array may include a red clear clear clear (RCCC) color filter array, a red clear clear blue (RCCB) color filter array, a red blue green clear (RBGC) color filter array, a Foveon X3 color filter array, a Bayer sensors (RGGB) color filter array, a monochrome sensor color filter array, and/or another type of color filter array. In some embodiments, clear pixel cameras, such as cameras with an RCCC, an RCCB, and/or an RBGC color filter array, may be used in an effort to increase light sensitivity.

In some examples, one or more of the camera(s) may be used to perform advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) functions (e.g., as part of a redundant or fail-safe design). For example, a Multi-Function Mono Camera may be installed to provide functions including lane departure warning, traffic sign assist and intelligent headlamp control. One or more of the camera(s) (e.g., all of the cameras) may record and provide image data (e.g., video) simultaneously.

One or more of the cameras may be mounted in a mounting assembly, such as a custom designed (3-D printed) assembly, in order to cut out stray light and reflections from within the car (e.g., reflections from the dashboard reflected in the windshield mirrors) which may interfere with the camera's image data capture abilities. With reference to wing-mirror mounting assemblies, the wing-mirror assemblies may be custom 3-D printed so that the camera mounting plate matches the shape of the wing-mirror. In some examples, the camera(s) may be integrated into the wing-mirror. For side-view cameras, the camera(s) may also be integrated within the four pillars at each corner of the cabin.

Cameras with a field of view that include portions of the environment in front of the vehicle 600 (e.g., front-facing cameras) may be used for surround view, to help identify forward facing paths and obstacles, as well aid in, with the help of one or more controllers 636 and/or control SoCs, providing information critical to generating an occupancy grid and/or determining the preferred vehicle paths. Front-facing cameras may be used to perform many of the same ADAS functions as LIDAR, including emergency braking, pedestrian detection, and collision avoidance. Front-facing cameras may also be used for ADAS functions and systems including Lane Departure Warnings (LDW), Autonomous Cruise Control (ACC), and/or other functions such as traffic sign recognition.

A variety of cameras may be used in a front-facing configuration, including, for example, a monocular camera platform that includes a CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) color imager. Another example may be a wide-view camera(s) 670 that may be used to perceive objects coming into view from the periphery (e.g., pedestrians, crossing traffic or bicycles). Although only one wide-view camera is illustrated in FIG. 6B, there may any number of wide-view cameras 670 on the vehicle 600. In addition, long-range camera(s) 698 (e.g., a long-view stereo camera pair) may be used for depth-based object detection, especially for objects for which a neural network has not yet been trained. The long-range camera(s) 698 may also be used for object detection and classification, as well as basic object tracking.

One or more stereo cameras 668 may also be included in a front-facing configuration. The stereo camera(s) 668 may include an integrated control unit comprising a scalable processing unit, which may provide a programmable logic (FPGA) and a multi-core micro-processor with an integrated CAN or Ethernet interface on a single chip. Such a unit may be used to generate a 3-D map of the vehicle's environment, including a distance estimate for all the points in the image. An alternative stereo camera(s) 668 may include a compact stereo vision sensor(s) that may include two camera lenses (one each on the left and right) and an image processing chip that may measure the distance from the vehicle to the target object and use the generated information (e.g., metadata) to activate the autonomous emergency braking and lane departure warning functions. Other types of stereo camera(s) 668 may be used in addition to, or alternatively from, those described herein.

Cameras with a field of view that include portions of the environment to the side of the vehicle 600 (e.g., side-view cameras) may be used for surround view, providing information used to create and update the occupancy grid, as well as to generate side impact collision warnings. For example, surround camera(s) 674 (e.g., four surround cameras 674 as illustrated in FIG. 6B) may be positioned to on the vehicle 600. The surround camera(s) 674 may include wide-view camera(s) 670, fisheye camera(s), 360 degree camera(s), and/or the like. Four example, four fisheye cameras may be positioned on the vehicle's front, rear, and sides. In an alternative arrangement, the vehicle may use three surround camera(s) 674 (e.g., left, right, and rear), and may leverage one or more other camera(s) (e.g., a forward-facing camera) as a fourth surround view camera.

Cameras with a field of view that include portions of the environment to the rear of the vehicle 600 (e.g., rear-view cameras) may be used for park assistance, surround view, rear collision warnings, and creating and updating the occupancy grid. A wide variety of cameras may be used including, but not limited to, cameras that are also suitable as a front-facing camera(s) (e.g., long-range and/or mid-range camera(s) 698, stereo camera(s) 668), infrared camera(s) 672, etc.), as described herein.

FIG. 6C is a block diagram of an example system architecture for the example autonomous vehicle 600 of FIG. 6A, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. It should be understood that this and other arrangements described herein are set forth only as examples. Other arrangements and elements (e.g., machines, interfaces, functions, orders, groupings of functions, etc.) may be used in addition to or instead of those shown, and some elements may be omitted altogether. Further, many of the elements described herein are functional entities that may be implemented as discrete or distributed components or in conjunction with other components, and in any suitable combination and location. Various functions described herein as being performed by entities may be carried out by hardware, firmware, and/or software. For instance, various functions may be carried out by a processor executing instructions stored in memory.

Each of the components, features, and systems of the vehicle 600 in FIG. 6C are illustrated as being connected via bus 602. The bus 602 may include a Controller Area Network (CAN) data interface (alternatively referred to herein as a “CAN bus”). A CAN may be a network inside the vehicle 600 used to aid in control of various features and functionality of the vehicle 600, such as actuation of brakes, acceleration, braking, steering, windshield wipers, etc. A CAN bus may be configured to have dozens or even hundreds of nodes, each with its own unique identifier (e.g., a CAN ID). The CAN bus may be read to find steering wheel angle, ground speed, engine revolutions per minute (RPMs), button positions, and/or other vehicle status indicators. The CAN bus may be ASIL B compliant.

Although the bus 602 is described herein as being a CAN bus, this is not intended to be limiting. For example, in addition to, or alternatively from, the CAN bus, FlexRay and/or Ethernet may be used. Additionally, although a single line is used to represent the bus 602, this is not intended to be limiting. For example, there may be any number of busses 602, which may include one or more CAN busses, one or more FlexRay busses, one or more Ethernet busses, and/or one or more other types of busses using a different protocol. In some examples, two or more busses 602 may be used to perform different functions, and/or may be used for redundancy. For example, a first bus 602 may be used for collision avoidance functionality and a second bus 602 may be used for actuation control. In any example, each bus 602 may communicate with any of the components of the vehicle 600, and two or more busses 602 may communicate with the same components. In some examples, each SoC 604, each controller 636, and/or each computer within the vehicle may have access to the same input data (e.g., inputs from sensors of the vehicle 600), and may be connected to a common bus, such the CAN bus.

The vehicle 600 may include one or more controller(s) 636, such as those described herein with respect to FIG. 6A. The controller(s) 636 may be used for a variety of functions. The controller(s) 636 may be coupled to any of the various other components and systems of the vehicle 600, and may be used for control of the vehicle 600, artificial intelligence of the vehicle 600, infotainment for the vehicle 600, and/or the like.

The vehicle 600 may include a system(s) on a chip (SoC) 604. The SoC 604 may include CPU(s) 606, GPU(s) 608, processor(s) 610, cache(s) 612, accelerator(s) 614, data store(s) 616, and/or other components and features not illustrated. The SoC(s) 604 may be used to control the vehicle 600 in a variety of platforms and systems. For example, the SoC(s) 604 may be combined in a system (e.g., the system of the vehicle 600) with an HD map 622 which may obtain map refreshes and/or updates via a network interface 624 from one or more servers (e.g., server(s) 678 of FIG. 6D).

The CPU(s) 606 may include a CPU cluster or CPU complex (alternatively referred to herein as a “CCPLEX”). The CPU(s) 606 may include multiple cores and/or L2 caches. For example, in some embodiments, the CPU(s) 606 may include eight cores in a coherent multi-processor configuration. In some embodiments, the CPU(s) 606 may include four dual-core clusters where each cluster has a dedicated L2 cache (e.g., a 2 MB L2 cache). The CPU(s) 606 (e.g., the CCPLEX) may be configured to support simultaneous cluster operation enabling any combination of the clusters of the CPU(s) 606 to be active at any given time.

The CPU(s) 606 may implement power management capabilities that include one or more of the following features: individual hardware blocks may be clock-gated automatically when idle to save dynamic power; each core clock may be gated when the core is not actively executing instructions due to execution of WFI/WFE instructions; each core may be independently power-gated; each core cluster may be independently clock-gated when all cores are clock-gated or power-gated; and/or each core cluster may be independently power-gated when all cores are power-gated. The CPU(s) 606 may further implement an enhanced algorithm for managing power states, where allowed power states and expected wakeup times are specified, and the hardware/microcode determines the best power state to enter for the core, cluster, and CCPLEX. The processing cores may support simplified power state entry sequences in software with the work offloaded to microcode.

The GPU(s) 608 may include an integrated GPU (alternatively referred to herein as an “iGPU”). The GPU(s) 608 may be programmable and may be efficient for parallel workloads. The GPU(s) 608, in some examples, may use an enhanced tensor instruction set. The GPU(s) 608 may include one or more streaming microprocessors, where each streaming microprocessor may include an L1 cache (e.g., an L1 cache with at least 96 KB storage capacity), and two or more of the streaming microprocessors may share an L2 cache (e.g., an L2 cache with a 512 KB storage capacity). In some embodiments, the GPU(s) 608 may include at least eight streaming microprocessors. The GPU(s) 608 may use compute application programming interface(s) (API(s)). In addition, the GPU(s) 608 may use one or more parallel computing platforms and/or programming models (e.g., NVIDIA's CUDA).

The GPU(s) 608 may be power-optimized for best performance in automotive and embedded use cases. For example, the GPU(s) 608 may be fabricated on a Fin field-effect transistor (FinFET). However, this is not intended to be limiting and the GPU(s) 608 may be fabricated using other semiconductor manufacturing processes. Each streaming microprocessor may incorporate a number of mixed-precision processing cores partitioned into multiple blocks. For example, and without limitation, 64 PF32 cores and 32 PF64 cores may be partitioned into four processing blocks. In such an example, each processing block may be allocated 16 FP32 cores, 8 FP64 cores, 16 INT32 cores, two mixed-precision NVIDIA TENSOR COREs for deep learning matrix arithmetic, an L0 instruction cache, a warp scheduler, a dispatch unit, and/or a 64 KB register file. In addition, the streaming microprocessors may include independent parallel integer and floating-point data paths to provide for efficient execution of workloads with a mix of computation and addressing calculations. The streaming microprocessors may include independent thread scheduling capability to enable finer-grain synchronization and cooperation between parallel threads. The streaming microprocessors may include a combined L1 data cache and shared memory unit in order to improve performance while simplifying programming.

The GPU(s) 608 may include a high bandwidth memory (HBM) and/or a 16 GB HBM2 memory subsystem to provide, in some examples, about 900 GB/second peak memory bandwidth. In some examples, in addition to, or alternatively from, the HBM memory, a synchronous graphics random-access memory (SGRAM) may be used, such as a graphics double data rate type five synchronous random-access memory (GDDR5).

The GPU(s) 608 may include unified memory technology including access counters to allow for more accurate migration of memory pages to the processor that accesses them most frequently, thereby improving efficiency for memory ranges shared between processors. In some examples, address translation services (ATS) support may be used to allow the GPU(s) 608 to access the CPU(s) 606 page tables directly. In such examples, when the GPU(s) 608 memory management unit (MMU) experiences a miss, an address translation request may be transmitted to the CPU(s) 606. In response, the CPU(s) 606 may look in its page tables for the virtual-to-physical mapping for the address and transmits the translation back to the GPU(s) 608. As such, unified memory technology may allow a single unified virtual address space for memory of both the CPU(s) 606 and the GPU(s) 608, thereby simplifying the GPU(s) 608 programming and porting of applications to the GPU(s) 608.

In addition, the GPU(s) 608 may include an access counter that may keep track of the frequency of access of the GPU(s) 608 to memory of other processors. The access counter may help ensure that memory pages are moved to the physical memory of the processor that is accessing the pages most frequently.

The SoC(s) 604 may include any number of cache(s) 612, including those described herein. For example, the cache(s) 612 may include an L3 cache that is available to both the CPU(s) 606 and the GPU(s) 608 (e.g., that is connected both the CPU(s) 606 and the GPU(s) 608). The cache(s) 612 may include a write-back cache that may keep track of states of lines, such as by using a cache coherence protocol (e.g., MEI, MESI, MSI, etc.). The L3 cache may include 4 MB or more, depending on the embodiment, although smaller cache sizes may be used.

The SoC(s) 604 may include an arithmetic logic unit(s) (ALU(s)) which may be leveraged in performing processing with respect to any of the variety of tasks or operations of the vehicle 600—such as processing DNNs. In addition, the SoC(s) 604 may include a floating point unit(s) (FPU(s))—or other math coprocessor or numeric coprocessor types—for performing mathematical operations within the system. For example, the SoC(s) 104 may include one or more FPUs integrated as execution units within a CPU(s) 606 and/or GPU(s) 608.

The SoC(s) 604 may include one or more accelerators 614 (e.g., hardware accelerators, software accelerators, or a combination thereof). For example, the SoC(s) 604 may include a hardware acceleration cluster that may include optimized hardware accelerators and/or large on-chip memory. The large on-chip memory (e.g., 4 MB of SRAM), may enable the hardware acceleration cluster to accelerate neural networks and other calculations. The hardware acceleration cluster may be used to complement the GPU(s) 608 and to off-load some of the tasks of the GPU(s) 608 (e.g., to free up more cycles of the GPU(s) 608 for performing other tasks). As an example, the accelerator(s) 614 may be used for targeted workloads (e.g., perception, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), etc.) that are stable enough to be amenable to acceleration. The term “CNN,” as used herein, may include all types of CNNs, including region-based or regional convolutional neural networks (RCNNs) and Fast RCNNs (e.g., as used for object detection).

The accelerator(s) 614 (e.g., the hardware acceleration cluster) may include a deep learning accelerator(s) (DLA). The DLA(s) may include one or more Tensor processing units (TPUs) that may be configured to provide an additional ten trillion operations per second for deep learning applications and inferencing. The TPUs may be accelerators configured to, and optimized for, performing image processing functions (e.g., for CNNs, RCNNs, etc.). The DLA(s) may further be optimized for a specific set of neural network types and floating point operations, as well as inferencing. The design of the DLA(s) may provide more performance per millimeter than a general-purpose GPU, and vastly exceeds the performance of a CPU. The TPU(s) may perform several functions, including a single-instance convolution function, supporting, for example, INT8, INT16, and FP16 data types for both features and weights, as well as post-processor functions.

The DLA(s) may quickly and efficiently execute neural networks, especially CNNs, on processed or unprocessed data for any of a variety of functions, including, for example and without limitation: a CNN for object identification and detection using data from camera sensors; a CNN for distance estimation using data from camera sensors; a CNN for emergency vehicle detection and identification and detection using data from microphones; a CNN for facial recognition and vehicle owner identification using data from camera sensors; and/or a CNN for security and/or safety related events.

The DLA(s) may perform any function of the GPU(s) 608, and by using an inference accelerator, for example, a designer may target either the DLA(s) or the GPU(s) 608 for any function. For example, the designer may focus processing of CNNs and floating point operations on the DLA(s) and leave other functions to the GPU(s) 608 and/or other accelerator(s) 614.

The accelerator(s) 614 (e.g., the hardware acceleration cluster) may include a programmable vision accelerator(s) (PVA), which may alternatively be referred to herein as a computer vision accelerator. The PVA(s) may be designed and configured to accelerate computer vision algorithms for the advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), autonomous driving, and/or augmented reality (AR) and/or virtual reality (VR) applications. The PVA(s) may provide a balance between performance and flexibility. For example, each PVA(s) may include, for example and without limitation, any number of reduced instruction set computer (RISC) cores, direct memory access (DMA), and/or any number of vector processors.

The RISC cores may interact with image sensors (e.g., the image sensors of any of the cameras described herein), image signal processor(s), and/or the like. Each of the RISC cores may include any amount of memory. The RISC cores may use any of a number of protocols, depending on the embodiment. In some examples, the RISC cores may execute a real-time operating system (RTOS). The RISC cores may be implemented using one or more integrated circuit devices, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and/or memory devices. For example, the RISC cores may include an instruction cache and/or a tightly coupled RAM.

The DMA may enable components of the PVA(s) to access the system memory independently of the CPU(s) 606. The DMA may support any number of features used to provide optimization to the PVA including, but not limited to, supporting multi-dimensional addressing and/or circular addressing. In some examples, the DMA may support up to six or more dimensions of addressing, which may include block width, block height, block depth, horizontal block stepping, vertical block stepping, and/or depth stepping.

The vector processors may be programmable processors that may be designed to efficiently and flexibly execute programming for computer vision algorithms and provide signal processing capabilities. In some examples, the PVA may include a PVA core and two vector processing subsystem partitions. The PVA core may include a processor subsystem, DMA engine(s) (e.g., two DMA engines), and/or other peripherals. The vector processing subsystem may operate as the primary processing engine of the PVA, and may include a vector processing unit (VPU), an instruction cache, and/or vector memory (e.g., VMEM). A VPU core may include a digital signal processor such as, for example, a single instruction, multiple data (SIMD), very long instruction word (VLIW) digital signal processor. The combination of the SIMD and VLIW may enhance throughput and speed.

Each of the vector processors may include an instruction cache and may be coupled to dedicated memory. As a result, in some examples, each of the vector processors may be configured to execute independently of the other vector processors. In other examples, the vector processors that are included in a particular PVA may be configured to employ data parallelism. For example, in some embodiments, the plurality of vector processors included in a single PVA may execute the same computer vision algorithm, but on different regions of an image. In other examples, the vector processors included in a particular PVA may simultaneously execute different computer vision algorithms, on the same image, or even execute different algorithms on sequential images or portions of an image. Among other things, any number of PVAs may be included in the hardware acceleration cluster and any number of vector processors may be included in each of the PVAs. In addition, the PVA(s) may include additional error correcting code (ECC) memory, to enhance overall system safety.

The accelerator(s) 614 (e.g., the hardware acceleration cluster) may include a computer vision network on-chip and SRAM, for providing a high-bandwidth, low latency SRAM for the accelerator(s) 614. In some examples, the on-chip memory may include at least 4 MB SRAM, consisting of, for example and without limitation, eight field-configurable memory blocks, that may be accessible by both the PVA and the DLA. Each pair of memory blocks may include an advanced peripheral bus (APB) interface, configuration circuitry, a controller, and a multiplexer. Any type of memory may be used. The PVA and DLA may access the memory via a backbone that provides the PVA and DLA with high-speed access to memory. The backbone may include a computer vision network on-chip that interconnects the PVA and the DLA to the memory (e.g., using the APB).

The computer vision network on-chip may include an interface that determines, before transmission of any control signal/address/data, that both the PVA and the DLA provide ready and valid signals. Such an interface may provide for separate phases and separate channels for transmitting control signals/addresses/data, as well as burst-type communications for continuous data transfer. This type of interface may comply with ISO 26262 or IEC 61508 standards, although other standards and protocols may be used.

In some examples, the SoC(s) 604 may include a real-time ray-tracing hardware accelerator, such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/101,232, filed on Aug. 10, 2018. The real-time ray-tracing hardware accelerator may be used to quickly and efficiently determine the positions and extents of objects (e.g., within a world model), to generate real-time visualization simulations, for RADAR signal interpretation, for sound propagation synthesis and/or analysis, for simulation of SONAR systems, for general wave propagation simulation, for comparison to LIDAR data for purposes of localization and/or other functions, and/or for other uses. In some embodiments, one or more tree traversal units (TTUs) may be used for executing one or more ray-tracing related operations.

The accelerator(s) 614 (e.g., the hardware accelerator cluster) have a wide array of uses for autonomous driving. The PVA may be a programmable vision accelerator that may be used for key processing stages in ADAS and autonomous vehicles. The PVA's capabilities are a good match for algorithmic domains needing predictable processing, at low power and low latency. In other words, the PVA performs well on semi-dense or dense regular computation, even on small data sets, which need predictable run-times with low latency and low power. Thus, in the context of platforms for autonomous vehicles, the PVAs are designed to run classic computer vision algorithms, as they are efficient at object detection and operating on integer math.

For example, according to one embodiment of the technology, the PVA is used to perform computer stereo vision. A semi-global matching-based algorithm may be used in some examples, although this is not intended to be limiting. Many applications for Level 3-5 autonomous driving require motion estimation/stereo matching on-the-fly (e.g., structure from motion, pedestrian recognition, lane detection, etc.). The PVA may perform computer stereo vision function on inputs from two monocular cameras.

In some examples, the PVA may be used to perform dense optical flow. According to process raw RADAR data (e.g., using a 4D Fast Fourier Transform) to provide Processed RADAR. In other examples, the PVA is used for time of flight depth processing, by processing raw time of flight data to provide processed time of flight data, for example.

The DLA may be used to run any type of network to enhance control and driving safety, including for example, a neural network that outputs a measure of confidence for each object detection. Such a confidence value may be interpreted as a probability, or as providing a relative “weight” of each detection compared to other detections. This confidence value enables the system to make further decisions regarding which detections should be considered as true positive detections rather than false positive detections. For example, the system may set a threshold value for the confidence and consider only the detections exceeding the threshold value as true positive detections. In an automatic emergency braking (AEB) system, false positive detections would cause the vehicle to automatically perform emergency braking, which is obviously undesirable. Therefore, only the most confident detections should be considered as triggers for AEB. The DLA may run a neural network for regressing the confidence value. The neural network may take as its input at least some subset of parameters, such as bounding box dimensions, ground plane estimate obtained (e.g. from another subsystem), inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor 666 output that correlates with the vehicle 600 orientation, distance, 3D location estimates of the object obtained from the neural network and/or other sensors (e.g., LIDAR sensor(s) 664 or RADAR sensor(s) 660), among others.

The SoC(s) 604 may include data store(s) 616 (e.g., memory). The data store(s) 616 may be on-chip memory of the SoC(s) 604, which may store neural networks to be executed on the GPU and/or the DLA. In some examples, the data store(s) 616 may be large enough in capacity to store multiple instances of neural networks for redundancy and safety. The data store(s) 612 may comprise L2 or L3 cache(s) 612. Reference to the data store(s) 616 may include reference to the memory associated with the PVA, DLA, and/or other accelerator(s) 614, as described herein.

The SoC(s) 604 may include one or more processor(s) 610 (e.g., embedded processors). The processor(s) 610 may include a boot and power management processor that may be a dedicated processor and subsystem to handle boot power and management functions and related security enforcement. The boot and power management processor may be a part of the SoC(s) 604 boot sequence and may provide runtime power management services. The boot power and management processor may provide clock and voltage programming, assistance in system low power state transitions, management of SoC(s) 604 thermals and temperature sensors, and/or management of the SoC(s) 604 power states. Each temperature sensor may be implemented as a ring-oscillator whose output frequency is proportional to temperature, and the SoC(s) 604 may use the ring-oscillators to detect temperatures of the CPU(s) 606, GPU(s) 608, and/or accelerator(s) 614. If temperatures are determined to exceed a threshold, the boot and power management processor may enter a temperature fault routine and put the SoC(s) 604 into a lower power state and/or put the vehicle 600 into a chauffeur to safe stop mode (e.g., bring the vehicle 600 to a safe stop).

The processor(s) 610 may further include a set of embedded processors that may serve as an audio processing engine. The audio processing engine may be an audio subsystem that enables full hardware support for multi-channel audio over multiple interfaces, and a broad and flexible range of audio I/O interfaces. In some examples, the audio processing engine is a dedicated processor core with a digital signal processor with dedicated RAM.

The processor(s) 610 may further include an always on processor engine that may provide necessary hardware features to support low power sensor management and wake use cases. The always on processor engine may include a processor core, a tightly coupled RAM, supporting peripherals (e.g., timers and interrupt controllers), various I/O controller peripherals, and routing logic.

The processor(s) 610 may further include a safety cluster engine that includes a dedicated processor subsystem to handle safety management for automotive applications. The safety cluster engine may include two or more processor cores, a tightly coupled RAM, support peripherals (e.g., timers, an interrupt controller, etc.), and/or routing logic. In a safety mode, the two or more cores may operate in a lockstep mode and function as a single core with comparison logic to detect any differences between their operations.

The processor(s) 610 may further include a real-time camera engine that may include a dedicated processor subsystem for handling real-time camera management.

The processor(s) 610 may further include a high-dynamic range signal processor that may include an image signal processor that is a hardware engine that is part of the camera processing pipeline.

The processor(s) 610 may include a video image compositor that may be a processing block (e.g., implemented on a microprocessor) that implements video post-processing functions needed by a video playback application to produce the final image for the player window. The video image compositor may perform lens distortion correction on wide-view camera(s) 670, surround camera(s) 674, and/or on in-cabin monitoring camera sensors. In-cabin monitoring camera sensor is preferably monitored by a neural network running on another instance of the Advanced SoC, configured to identify in cabin events and respond accordingly. An in-cabin system may perform lip reading to activate cellular service and place a phone call, dictate emails, change the vehicle's destination, activate or change the vehicle's infotainment system and settings, or provide voice-activated web surfing. Certain functions are available to the driver only when the vehicle is operating in an autonomous mode, and are disabled otherwise.

The video image compositor may include enhanced temporal noise reduction for both spatial and temporal noise reduction. For example, where motion occurs in a video, the noise reduction weights spatial information appropriately, decreasing the weight of information provided by adjacent frames. Where an image or portion of an image does not include motion, the temporal noise reduction performed by the video image compositor may use information from the previous image to reduce noise in the current image.

The video image compositor may also be configured to perform stereo rectification on input stereo lens frames. The video image compositor may further be used for user interface composition when the operating system desktop is in use, and the GPU(s) 608 is not required to continuously render new surfaces. Even when the GPU(s) 608 is powered on and active doing 3D rendering, the video image compositor may be used to offload the GPU(s) 608 to improve performance and responsiveness.

The SoC(s) 604 may further include a mobile industry processor interface (MIPI) camera serial interface for receiving video and input from cameras, a high-speed interface, and/or a video input block that may be used for camera and related pixel input functions. The SoC(s) 604 may further include an input/output controller(s) that may be controlled by software and may be used for receiving I/O signals that are uncommitted to a specific role.

The SoC(s) 604 may further include a broad range of peripheral interfaces to enable communication with peripherals, audio codecs, power management, and/or other devices. The SoC(s) 604 may be used to process data from cameras (e.g., connected over Gigabit Multimedia Serial Link and Ethernet), sensors (e.g., LIDAR sensor(s) 664, RADAR sensor(s) 660, etc. that may be connected over Ethernet), data from bus 602 (e.g., speed of vehicle 600, steering wheel position, etc.), data from GNSS sensor(s) 658 (e.g., connected over Ethernet or CAN bus). The SoC(s) 604 may further include dedicated high-performance mass storage controllers that may include their own DMA engines, and that may be used to free the CPU(s) 606 from routine data management tasks.

The SoC(s) 604 may be an end-to-end platform with a flexible architecture that spans automation levels 3-5, thereby providing a comprehensive functional safety architecture that leverages and makes efficient use of computer vision and ADAS techniques for diversity and redundancy, provides a platform for a flexible, reliable driving software stack, along with deep learning tools. The SoC(s) 604 may be faster, more reliable, and even more energy-efficient and space-efficient than conventional systems. For example, the accelerator(s) 614, when combined with the CPU(s) 606, the GPU(s) 608, and the data store(s) 616, may provide for a fast, efficient platform for level 3-5 autonomous vehicles.

The technology thus provides capabilities and functionality that cannot be achieved by conventional systems. For example, computer vision algorithms may be executed on CPUs, which may be configured using high-level programming language, such as the C programming language, to execute a wide variety of processing algorithms across a wide variety of visual data. However, CPUs are oftentimes unable to meet the performance requirements of many computer vision applications, such as those related to execution time and power consumption, for example. In particular, many CPUs are unable to execute complex object detection algorithms in real-time, which is a requirement of in-vehicle ADAS applications, and a requirement for practical Level 3-5 autonomous vehicles.

In contrast to conventional systems, by providing a CPU complex, GPU complex, and a hardware acceleration cluster, the technology described herein allows for multiple neural networks to be performed simultaneously and/or sequentially, and for the results to be combined together to enable Level 3-5 autonomous driving functionality. For example, a CNN executing on the DLA or dGPU (e.g., the GPU(s) 620) may include a text and word recognition, allowing the supercomputer to read and understand traffic signs, including signs for which the neural network has not been specifically trained. The DLA may further include a neural network that is able to identify, interpret, and provides semantic understanding of the sign, and to pass that semantic understanding to the path planning modules running on the CPU Complex.

As another example, multiple neural networks may be run simultaneously, as is required for Level 3, 4, or 5 driving. For example, a warning sign consisting of “Caution: flashing lights indicate icy conditions,” along with an electric light, may be independently or collectively interpreted by several neural networks. The sign itself may be identified as a traffic sign by a first deployed neural network (e.g., a neural network that has been trained), the text “Flashing lights indicate icy conditions” may be interpreted by a second deployed neural network, which informs the vehicle's path planning software (preferably executing on the CPU Complex) that when flashing lights are detected, icy conditions exist. The flashing light may be identified by operating a third deployed neural network over multiple frames, informing the vehicle's path-planning software of the presence (or absence) of flashing lights. All three neural networks may run simultaneously, such as within the DLA and/or on the GPU(s) 608.

In some examples, a CNN for facial recognition and vehicle owner identification may use data from camera sensors to identify the presence of an authorized driver and/or owner of the vehicle 600. The always on sensor processing engine may be used to unlock the vehicle when the owner approaches the driver door and turn on the lights, and, in security mode, to disable the vehicle when the owner leaves the vehicle. In this way, the SoC(s) 604 provide for security against theft and/or carjacking.

In another example, a CNN for emergency vehicle detection and identification may use data from microphones 696 to detect and identify emergency vehicle sirens. In contrast to conventional systems, that use general classifiers to detect sirens and manually extract features, the SoC(s) 604 use the CNN for classifying environmental and urban sounds, as well as classifying visual data. In a preferred embodiment, the CNN running on the DLA is trained to identify the relative closing speed of the emergency vehicle (e.g., by using the Doppler Effect). The CNN may also be trained to identify emergency vehicles specific to the local area in which the vehicle is operating, as identified by GNSS sensor(s) 658. Thus, for example, when operating in Europe the CNN will seek to detect European sirens, and when in the United States the CNN will seek to identify only North American sirens. Once an emergency vehicle is detected, a control program may be used to execute an emergency vehicle safety routine, slowing the vehicle, pulling over to the side of the road, parking the vehicle, and/or idling the vehicle, with the assistance of ultrasonic sensors 662, until the emergency vehicle(s) passes.

The vehicle may include a CPU(s) 618 (e.g., discrete CPU(s), or dCPU(s)), that may be coupled to the SoC(s) 604 via a high-speed interconnect (e.g., PCIe). The CPU(s) 618 may include an X86 processor, for example. The CPU(s) 618 may be used to perform any of a variety of functions, including arbitrating potentially inconsistent results between ADAS sensors and the SoC(s) 604, and/or monitoring the status and health of the controller(s) 636 and/or infotainment SoC 630, for example.

The vehicle 600 may include a GPU(s) 620 (e.g., discrete GPU(s), or dGPU(s)), that may be coupled to the SoC(s) 604 via a high-speed interconnect (e.g., NVIDIA's NVLINK). The GPU(s) 620 may provide additional artificial intelligence functionality, such as by executing redundant and/or different neural networks, and may be used to train and/or update neural networks based on input (e.g., sensor data) from sensors of the vehicle 600.

The vehicle 600 may further include the network interface 624 which may include one or more wireless antennas 626 (e.g., one or more wireless antennas for different communication protocols, such as a cellular antenna, a Bluetooth antenna, etc.). The network interface 624 may be used to enable wireless connectivity over the Internet with the cloud (e.g., with the server(s) 678 and/or other network devices), with other vehicles, and/or with computing devices (e.g., client devices of passengers). To communicate with other vehicles, a direct link may be established between the two vehicles and/or an indirect link may be established (e.g., across networks and over the Internet). Direct links may be provided using a vehicle-to-vehicle communication link. The vehicle-to-vehicle communication link may provide the vehicle 600 information about vehicles in proximity to the vehicle 600 (e.g., vehicles in front of, on the side of, and/or behind the vehicle 600). This functionality may be part of a cooperative adaptive cruise control functionality of the vehicle 600.

The network interface 624 may include a SoC that provides modulation and demodulation functionality and enables the controller(s) 636 to communicate over wireless networks. The network interface 624 may include a radio frequency front-end for up-conversion from baseband to radio frequency, and down conversion from radio frequency to baseband. The frequency conversions may be performed through well-known processes, and/or may be performed using super-heterodyne processes. In some examples, the radio frequency front end functionality may be provided by a separate chip. The network interface may include wireless functionality for communicating over LTE, WCDMA, UMTS, GSM, CDMA2000, Bluetooth, Bluetooth LE, Wi-Fi, Z-Wave, ZigBee, LoRaWAN, and/or other wireless protocols.

The vehicle 600 may further include data store(s) 628 which may include off-chip (e.g., off the SoC(s) 604) storage. The data store(s) 628 may include one or more storage elements including RAM, SRAM, DRAM, VRAM, Flash, hard disks, and/or other components and/or devices that may store at least one bit of data.

The vehicle 600 may further include GNSS sensor(s) 658. The GNSS sensor(s) 658 (e.g., GPS, assisted GPS sensors, differential GPS (DGPS) sensors, etc.), to assist in mapping, perception, occupancy grid generation, and/or path planning functions. Any number of GNSS sensor(s) 658 may be used, including, for example and without limitation, a GPS using a USB connector with an Ethernet to Serial (RS-232) bridge.

The vehicle 600 may further include RADAR sensor(s) 660. The RADAR sensor(s) 660 may be used by the vehicle 600 for long-range vehicle detection, even in darkness and/or severe weather conditions. RADAR functional safety levels may be ASIL B. The RADAR sensor(s) 660 may use the CAN and/or the bus 602 (e.g., to transmit data generated by the RADAR sensor(s) 660) for control and to access object tracking data, with access to Ethernet to access raw data in some examples. A wide variety of RADAR sensor types may be used. For example, and without limitation, the RADAR sensor(s) 660 may be suitable for front, rear, and side RADAR use. In some example, Pulse Doppler RADAR sensor(s) are used.

The RADAR sensor(s) 660 may include different configurations, such as long range with narrow field of view, short range with wide field of view, short range side coverage, etc. In some examples, long-range RADAR may be used for adaptive cruise control functionality. The long-range RADAR systems may provide a broad field of view realized by two or more independent scans, such as within a 250 m range. The RADAR sensor(s) 660 may help in distinguishing between static and moving objects, and may be used by ADAS systems for emergency brake assist and forward collision warning. Long-range RADAR sensors may include monostatic multimodal RADAR with multiple (e.g., six or more) fixed RADAR antennae and a high-speed CAN and FlexRay interface. In an example with six antennae, the central four antennae may create a focused beam pattern, designed to record the vehicle's 600 surroundings at higher speeds with minimal interference from traffic in adjacent lanes. The other two antennae may expand the field of view, making it possible to quickly detect vehicles entering or leaving the vehicle's 600 lane.

Mid-range RADAR systems may include, as an example, a range of up to 660 m (front) or 80 m (rear), and a field of view of up to 42 degrees (front) or 650 degrees (rear). Short-range RADAR systems may include, without limitation, RADAR sensors designed to be installed at both ends of the rear bumper. When installed at both ends of the rear bumper, such a RADAR sensor systems may create two beams that constantly monitor the blind spot in the rear and next to the vehicle.

Short-range RADAR systems may be used in an ADAS system for blind spot detection and/or lane change assist.

The vehicle 600 may further include ultrasonic sensor(s) 662. The ultrasonic sensor(s) 662, which may be positioned at the front, back, and/or the sides of the vehicle 600, may be used for park assist and/or to create and update an occupancy grid. A wide variety of ultrasonic sensor(s) 662 may be used, and different ultrasonic sensor(s) 662 may be used for different ranges of detection (e.g., 2.5 m, 4 m). The ultrasonic sensor(s) 662 may operate at functional safety levels of ASIL B.

The vehicle 600 may include LIDAR sensor(s) 664. The LIDAR sensor(s) 664 may be used for object and pedestrian detection, emergency braking, collision avoidance, and/or other functions. The LIDAR sensor(s) 664 may be functional safety level ASIL B. In some examples, the vehicle 600 may include multiple LIDAR sensors 664 (e.g., two, four, six, etc.) that may use Ethernet (e.g., to provide data to a Gigabit Ethernet switch).

In some examples, the LIDAR sensor(s) 664 may be capable of providing a list of objects and their distances for a 360-degree field of view. Commercially available LIDAR sensor(s) 664 may have an advertised range of approximately 600 m, with an accuracy of 2 cm-3 cm, and with support for a 600 Mbps Ethernet connection, for example. In some examples, one or more non-protruding LIDAR sensors 664 may be used. In such examples, the LIDAR sensor(s) 664 may be implemented as a small device that may be embedded into the front, rear, sides, and/or corners of the vehicle 600. The LIDAR sensor(s) 664, in such examples, may provide up to a 120-degree horizontal and 35-degree vertical field-of-view, with a 200 m range even for low-reflectivity objects. Front-mounted LIDAR sensor(s) 664 may be configured for a horizontal field of view between 45 degrees and 135 degrees.

In some examples, LIDAR technologies, such as 3D flash LIDAR, may also be used. 3D Flash LIDAR uses a flash of a laser as a transmission source, to illuminate vehicle surroundings up to approximately 200 m. A flash LIDAR unit includes a receptor, which records the laser pulse transit time and the reflected light on each pixel, which in turn corresponds to the range from the vehicle to the objects. Flash LIDAR may allow for highly accurate and distortion-free images of the surroundings to be generated with every laser flash. In some examples, four flash LIDAR sensors may be deployed, one at each side of the vehicle 600. Available 3D flash LIDAR systems include a solid-state 3D staring array LIDAR camera with no moving parts other than a fan (e.g., a non-scanning LIDAR device). The flash LIDAR device may use a 5 nanosecond class I (eye-safe) laser pulse per frame and may capture the reflected laser light in the form of 3D range point clouds and co-registered intensity data. By using flash LIDAR, and because flash LIDAR is a solid-state device with no moving parts, the LIDAR sensor(s) 664 may be less susceptible to motion blur, vibration, and/or shock.

The vehicle may further include IMU sensor(s) 666. The IMU sensor(s) 666 may be located at a center of the rear axle of the vehicle 600, in some examples. The IMU sensor(s) 666 may include, for example and without limitation, an accelerometer(s), a magnetometer(s), a gyroscope(s), a magnetic compass(es), and/or other sensor types. In some examples, such as in six-axis applications, the IMU sensor(s) 666 may include accelerometers and gyroscopes, while in nine-axis applications, the IMU sensor(s) 666 may include accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers.

In some embodiments, the IMU sensor(s) 666 may be implemented as a miniature, high performance GPS-Aided Inertial Navigation System (GPS/INS) that combines micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) inertial sensors, a high-sensitivity GPS receiver, and advanced Kalman filtering algorithms to provide estimates of position, velocity, and attitude. As such, in some examples, the IMU sensor(s) 666 may enable the vehicle 600 to estimate heading without requiring input from a magnetic sensor by directly observing and correlating the changes in velocity from GPS to the IMU sensor(s) 666. In some examples, the IMU sensor(s) 666 and the GNSS sensor(s) 658 may be combined in a single integrated unit.

The vehicle may include microphone(s) 696 placed in and/or around the vehicle 600. The microphone(s) 696 may be used for emergency vehicle detection and identification, among other things.

The vehicle may further include any number of camera types, including stereo camera(s) 668, wide-view camera(s) 670, infrared camera(s) 672, surround camera(s) 674, long-range and/or mid-range camera(s) 698, and/or other camera types. The cameras may be used to capture image data around an entire periphery of the vehicle 600. The types of cameras used depends on the embodiments and requirements for the vehicle 600, and any combination of camera types may be used to provide the necessary coverage around the vehicle 600. In addition, the number of cameras may differ depending on the embodiment. For example, the vehicle may include six cameras, seven cameras, ten cameras, twelve cameras, and/or another number of cameras. The cameras may support, as an example and without limitation, Gigabit Multimedia Serial Link (GMSL) and/or Gigabit Ethernet. Each of the camera(s) is described with more detail herein with respect to FIG. 6A and FIG. 6B.

The vehicle 600 may further include vibration sensor(s) 642. The vibration sensor(s) 642 may measure vibrations of components of the vehicle, such as the axle(s). For example, changes in vibrations may indicate a change in road surfaces. In another example, when two or more vibration sensors 642 are used, the differences between the vibrations may be used to determine friction or slippage of the road surface (e.g., when the difference in vibration is between a power-driven axle and a freely rotating axle).

The vehicle 600 may include an ADAS system 638. The ADAS system 638 may include a SoC, in some examples. The ADAS system 638 may include autonomous/adaptive/automatic cruise control (ACC), cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC), forward crash warning (FCW), automatic emergency braking (AEB), lane departure warnings (LDW), lane keep assist (LKA), blind spot warning (BSW), rear cross-traffic warning (RCTW), collision warning systems (CWS), lane centering (LC), and/or other features and functionality.

The ACC systems may use RADAR sensor(s) 660, LIDAR sensor(s) 664, and/or a camera(s). The ACC systems may include longitudinal ACC and/or lateral ACC. Longitudinal ACC monitors and controls the distance to the vehicle immediately ahead of the vehicle 600 and automatically adjust the vehicle speed to maintain a safe distance from vehicles ahead. Lateral ACC performs distance keeping, and advises the vehicle 600 to change lanes when necessary. Lateral ACC is related to other ADAS applications such as LCA and CWS.

CACC uses information from other vehicles that may be received via the network interface 624 and/or the wireless antenna(s) 626 from other vehicles via a wireless link, or indirectly, over a network connection (e.g., over the Internet). Direct links may be provided by a vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication link, while indirect links may be infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V) communication link. In general, the V2V communication concept provides information about the immediately preceding vehicles (e.g., vehicles immediately ahead of and in the same lane as the vehicle 600), while the I2V communication concept provides information about traffic further ahead. CACC systems may include either or both I2V and V2V information sources. Given the information of the vehicles ahead of the vehicle 600, CACC may be more reliable and it has potential to improve traffic flow smoothness and reduce congestion on the road.

FCW systems are designed to alert the driver to a hazard, so that the driver may take corrective action. FCW systems use a front-facing camera and/or RADAR sensor(s) 660, coupled to a dedicated processor, DSP, FPGA, and/or ASIC, that is electrically coupled to driver feedback, such as a display, speaker, and/or vibrating component. FCW systems may provide a warning, such as in the form of a sound, visual warning, vibration and/or a quick brake pulse.

AEB systems detect an impending forward collision with another vehicle or other object, and may automatically apply the brakes if the driver does not take corrective action within a specified time or distance parameter. AEB systems may use front-facing camera(s) and/or RADAR sensor(s) 660, coupled to a dedicated processor, DSP, FPGA, and/or ASIC. When the AEB system detects a hazard, it typically first alerts the driver to take corrective action to avoid the collision and, if the driver does not take corrective action, the AEB system may automatically apply the brakes in an effort to prevent, or at least mitigate, the impact of the predicted collision. AEB systems, may include techniques such as dynamic brake support and/or crash imminent braking.

LDW systems provide visual, audible, and/or tactile warnings, such as steering wheel or seat vibrations, to alert the driver when the vehicle 600 crosses lane markings. A LDW system does not activate when the driver indicates an intentional lane departure, by activating a turn signal. LDW systems may use front-side facing cameras, coupled to a dedicated processor, DSP, FPGA, and/or ASIC, that is electrically coupled to driver feedback, such as a display, speaker, and/or vibrating component.

LKA systems are a variation of LDW systems. LKA systems provide steering input or braking to correct the vehicle 600 if the vehicle 600 starts to exit the lane.

BSW systems detects and warn the driver of vehicles in an automobile's blind spot. BSW systems may provide a visual, audible, and/or tactile alert to indicate that merging or changing lanes is unsafe. The system may provide an additional warning when the driver uses a turn signal. BSW systems may use rear-side facing camera(s) and/or RADAR sensor(s) 660, coupled to a dedicated processor, DSP, FPGA, and/or ASIC, that is electrically coupled to driver feedback, such as a display, speaker, and/or vibrating component.

RCTW systems may provide visual, audible, and/or tactile notification when an object is detected outside the rear-camera range when the vehicle 600 is backing up. Some RCTW systems include AEB to ensure that the vehicle brakes are applied to avoid a crash. RCTW systems may use one or more rear-facing RADAR sensor(s) 660, coupled to a dedicated processor, DSP, FPGA, and/or ASIC, that is electrically coupled to driver feedback, such as a display, speaker, and/or vibrating component.

Conventional ADAS systems may be prone to false positive results which may be annoying and distracting to a driver, but typically are not catastrophic, because the ADAS systems alert the driver and allow the driver to decide whether a safety condition truly exists and act accordingly. However, in an autonomous vehicle 600, the vehicle 600 itself must, in the case of conflicting results, decide whether to heed the result from a primary computer or a secondary computer (e.g., a first controller 636 or a second controller 636). For example, in some embodiments, the ADAS system 638 may be a backup and/or secondary computer for providing perception information to a backup computer rationality module. The backup computer rationality monitor may run a redundant diverse software on hardware components to detect faults in perception and dynamic driving tasks. Outputs from the ADAS system 638 may be provided to a supervisory MCU. If outputs from the primary computer and the secondary computer conflict, the supervisory MCU must determine how to reconcile the conflict to ensure safe operation.

In some examples, the primary computer may be configured to provide the supervisory MCU with a confidence score, indicating the primary computer's confidence in the chosen result. If the confidence score exceeds a threshold, the supervisory MCU may follow the primary computer's direction, regardless of whether the secondary computer provides a conflicting or inconsistent result. Where the confidence score does not meet the threshold, and where the primary and secondary computer indicate different results (e.g., the conflict), the supervisory MCU may arbitrate between the computers to determine the appropriate outcome.

The supervisory MCU may be configured to run a neural network(s) that is trained and configured to determine, based on outputs from the primary computer and the secondary computer, conditions under which the secondary computer provides false alarms. Thus, the neural network(s) in the supervisory MCU may learn when the secondary computer's output may be trusted, and when it cannot. For example, when the secondary computer is a RADAR-based FCW system, a neural network(s) in the supervisory MCU may learn when the FCW system is identifying metallic objects that are not, in fact, hazards, such as a drainage grate or manhole cover that triggers an alarm. Similarly, when the secondary computer is a camera-based LDW system, a neural network in the supervisory MCU may learn to override the LDW when bicyclists or pedestrians are present and a lane departure is, in fact, the safest maneuver. In embodiments that include a neural network(s) running on the supervisory MCU, the supervisory MCU may include at least one of a DLA or GPU suitable for running the neural network(s) with associated memory. In preferred embodiments, the supervisory MCU may comprise and/or be included as a component of the SoC(s) 604.

In other examples, ADAS system 638 may include a secondary computer that performs ADAS functionality using traditional rules of computer vision. As such, the secondary computer may use classic computer vision rules (if-then), and the presence of a neural network(s) in the supervisory MCU may improve reliability, safety and performance. For example, the diverse implementation and intentional non-identity makes the overall system more fault-tolerant, especially to faults caused by software (or software-hardware interface) functionality. For example, if there is a software bug or error in the software running on the primary computer, and the non-identical software code running on the secondary computer provides the same overall result, the supervisory MCU may have greater confidence that the overall result is correct, and the bug in software or hardware on primary computer is not causing material error.

In some examples, the output of the ADAS system 638 may be fed into the primary computer's perception block and/or the primary computer's dynamic driving task block. For example, if the ADAS system 638 indicates a forward crash warning due to an object immediately ahead, the perception block may use this information when identifying objects. In other examples, the secondary computer may have its own neural network which is trained and thus reduces the risk of false positives, as described herein.

The vehicle 600 may further include the infotainment SoC 630 (e.g., an in-vehicle infotainment system (IVI)). Although illustrated and described as a SoC, the infotainment system may not be a SoC, and may include two or more discrete components. The infotainment SoC 630 may include a combination of hardware and software that may be used to provide audio (e.g., music, a personal digital assistant, navigational instructions, news, radio, etc.), video (e.g., TV, movies, streaming, etc.), phone (e.g., hands-free calling), network connectivity (e.g., LTE, Wi-Fi, etc.), and/or information services (e.g., navigation systems, rear-parking assistance, a radio data system, vehicle related information such as fuel level, total distance covered, brake fuel level, oil level, door open/close, air filter information, etc.) to the vehicle 600. For example, the infotainment SoC 630 may radios, disk players, navigation systems, video players, USB and Bluetooth connectivity, carputers, in-car entertainment, Wi-Fi, steering wheel audio controls, hands free voice control, a heads-up display (HUD), an HMI display 634, a telematics device, a control panel (e.g., for controlling and/or interacting with various components, features, and/or systems), and/or other components. The infotainment SoC 630 may further be used to provide information (e.g., visual and/or audible) to a user(s) of the vehicle, such as information from the ADAS system 638, autonomous driving information such as planned vehicle maneuvers, trajectories, surrounding environment information (e.g., intersection information, vehicle information, road information, etc.), and/or other information.

The infotainment SoC 630 may include GPU functionality. The infotainment SoC 630 may communicate over the bus 602 (e.g., CAN bus, Ethernet, etc.) with other devices, systems, and/or components of the vehicle 600. In some examples, the infotainment SoC 630 may be coupled to a supervisory MCU such that the GPU of the infotainment system may perform some self-driving functions in the event that the primary controller(s) 636 (e.g., the primary and/or backup computers of the vehicle 600) fail. In such an example, the infotainment SoC 630 may put the vehicle 600 into a chauffeur to safe stop mode, as described herein.

The vehicle 600 may further include an instrument cluster 632 (e.g., a digital dash, an electronic instrument cluster, a digital instrument panel, etc.). The instrument cluster 632 may include a controller and/or supercomputer (e.g., a discrete controller or supercomputer). The instrument cluster 632 may include a set of instrumentation such as a speedometer, fuel level, oil pressure, tachometer, odometer, turn indicators, gearshift position indicator, seat belt warning light(s), parking-brake warning light(s), engine-malfunction light(s), airbag (SRS) system information, lighting controls, safety system controls, navigation information, etc. In some examples, information may be displayed and/or shared among the infotainment SoC 630 and the instrument cluster 632. In other words, the instrument cluster 632 may be included as part of the infotainment SoC 630, or vice versa.

FIG. 6D is a system diagram for communication between cloud-based server(s) and the example autonomous vehicle 600 of FIG. 6A, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. The system 676 may include server(s) 678, network(s) 690, and vehicles, including the vehicle 600. The server(s) 678 may include a plurality of GPUs 684(A)-684(H) (collectively referred to herein as GPUs 684), PCIe switches 682(A)-682(H) (collectively referred to herein as PCIe switches 682), and/or CPUs 680(A)-680(B) (collectively referred to herein as CPUs 680). The GPUs 684, the CPUs 680, and the PCIe switches may be interconnected with high-speed interconnects such as, for example and without limitation, NVLink interfaces 688 developed by NVIDIA and/or PCIe connections 686. In some examples, the GPUs 684 are connected via NVLink and/or NVSwitch SoC and the GPUs 684 and the PCIe switches 682 are connected via PCIe interconnects. Although eight GPUs 684, two CPUs 680, and two PCIe switches are illustrated, this is not intended to be limiting. Depending on the embodiment, each of the server(s) 678 may include any number of GPUs 684, CPUs 680, and/or PCIe switches. For example, the server(s) 678 may each include eight, sixteen, thirty-two, and/or more GPUs 684.

The server(s) 678 may receive, over the network(s) 690 and from the vehicles, image data representative of images showing unexpected or changed road conditions, such as recently commenced road-work. The server(s) 678 may transmit, over the network(s) 690 and to the vehicles, neural networks 692, updated neural networks 692, and/or map information 694, including information regarding traffic and road conditions. The updates to the map information 694 may include updates for the HD map 622, such as information regarding construction sites, potholes, detours, flooding, and/or other obstructions. In some examples, the neural networks 692, the updated neural networks 692, and/or the map information 694 may have resulted from new training and/or experiences represented in data received from any number of vehicles in the environment, and/or based on training performed at a datacenter (e.g., using the server(s) 678 and/or other servers).

The server(s) 678 may be used to train machine learning models (e.g., neural networks) based on training data. The training data may be generated by the vehicles, and/or may be generated in a simulation (e.g., using a game engine). In some examples, the training data is tagged (e.g., where the neural network benefits from supervised learning) and/or undergoes other pre-processing, while in other examples the training data is not tagged and/or pre-processed (e.g., where the neural network does not require supervised learning). Training may be executed according to any one or more classes of machine learning techniques, including, without limitation, classes such as: supervised training, semi-supervised training, unsupervised training, self-learning, reinforcement learning, federated learning, transfer learning, feature learning (including principal component and cluster analyses), multi-linear subspace learning, manifold learning, representation learning (including spare dictionary learning), rule-based machine learning, anomaly detection, and any variants or combinations therefor. Once the machine learning models are trained, the machine learning models may be used by the vehicles (e.g., transmitted to the vehicles over the network(s) 690, and/or the machine learning models may be used by the server(s) 678 to remotely monitor the vehicles.

In some examples, the server(s) 678 may receive data from the vehicles and apply the data to up-to-date real-time neural networks for real-time intelligent inferencing. The server(s) 678 may include deep-learning supercomputers and/or dedicated AI computers powered by GPU(s) 684, such as a DGX and DGX Station machines developed by NVIDIA. However, in some examples, the server(s) 678 may include deep learning infrastructure that use only CPU-powered datacenters.

The deep-learning infrastructure of the server(s) 678 may be capable of fast, real-time inferencing, and may use that capability to evaluate and verify the health of the processors, software, and/or associated hardware in the vehicle 600. For example, the deep-learning infrastructure may receive periodic updates from the vehicle 600, such as a sequence of images and/or objects that the vehicle 600 has located in that sequence of images (e.g., via computer vision and/or other machine learning object classification techniques). The deep-learning infrastructure may run its own neural network to identify the objects and compare them with the objects identified by the vehicle 600 and, if the results do not match and the infrastructure concludes that the AI in the vehicle 600 is malfunctioning, the server(s) 678 may transmit a signal to the vehicle 600 instructing a fail-safe computer of the vehicle 600 to assume control, notify the passengers, and complete a safe parking maneuver.

For inferencing, the server(s) 678 may include the GPU(s) 684 and one or more programmable inference accelerators (e.g., NVIDIA's TensorRT). The combination of GPU-powered servers and inference acceleration may make real-time responsiveness possible. In other examples, such as where performance is less critical, servers powered by CPUs, FPGAs, and other processors may be used for inferencing.

Example Computing Device

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an example computing device(s) 700 suitable for use in implementing some embodiments of the present disclosure. Computing device 700 may include an interconnect system 702 that directly or indirectly couples the following devices: memory 704, one or more central processing units (CPUs) 706, one or more graphics processing units (GPUs) 708, a communication interface 710, input/output (I/O) ports 712, input/output components 714, a power supply 716, one or more presentation components 718 (e.g., display(s)), and one or more logic units 720. In at least one embodiment, the computing device(s) 700 may comprise one or more virtual machines (VMs), and/or any of the components thereof may comprise virtual components (e.g., virtual hardware components). For non-limiting examples, one or more of the GPUs 708 may comprise one or more vGPUs, one or more of the CPUs 706 may comprise one or more vCPUs, and/or one or more of the logic units 720 may comprise one or more virtual logic units. As such, a computing device(s) 700 may include discrete components (e.g., a full GPU dedicated to the computing device 700), virtual components (e.g., a portion of a GPU dedicated to the computing device 700), or a combination thereof.

Although the various blocks of FIG. 7 are shown as connected via the interconnect system 702 with lines, this is not intended to be limiting and is for clarity only. For example, in some embodiments, a presentation component 718, such as a display device, may be considered an I/O component 714 (e.g., if the display is a touch screen). As another example, the CPUs 706 and/or GPUs 708 may include memory (e.g., the memory 704 may be representative of a storage device in addition to the memory of the GPUs 708, the CPUs 706, and/or other components). In other words, the computing device of FIG. 7 is merely illustrative. Distinction is not made between such categories as “workstation,” “server,” “laptop,” “desktop,” “tablet,” “client device,” “mobile device,” “hand-held device,” “game console,” “electronic control unit (ECU),” “virtual reality system,” and/or other device or system types, as all are contemplated within the scope of the computing device of FIG. 7.

The interconnect system 702 may represent one or more links or busses, such as an address bus, a data bus, a control bus, or a combination thereof. The interconnect system 702 may include one or more bus or link types, such as an industry standard architecture (ISA) bus, an extended industry standard architecture (EISA) bus, a video electronics standards association (VESA) bus, a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) bus, a peripheral component interconnect express (PCIe) bus, and/or another type of bus or link. In some embodiments, there are direct connections between components. As an example, the CPU 706 may be directly connected to the memory 704. Further, the CPU 706 may be directly connected to the GPU 708. Where there is direct, or point-to-point connection between components, the interconnect system 702 may include a PCIe link to carry out the connection. In these examples, a PCI bus need not be included in the computing device 700.

The memory 704 may include any of a variety of computer-readable media. The computer-readable media may be any available media that may be accessed by the computing device 700. The computer-readable media may include both volatile and nonvolatile media, and removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and not limitation, the computer-readable media may comprise computer-storage media and communication media.

The computer-storage media may include both volatile and nonvolatile media and/or removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and/or other data types. For example, the memory 704 may store computer-readable instructions (e.g., that represent a program(s) and/or a program element(s), such as an operating system. Computer-storage media may include, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which may be used to store the desired information and which may be accessed by computing device 700. As used herein, computer storage media does not comprise signals per se.

The computer storage media may embody computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and/or other data types in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” may refer to a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, the computer storage media may include wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media. Combinations of any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.

The CPU(s) 706 may be configured to execute at least some of the computer-readable instructions to control one or more components of the computing device 700 to perform one or more of the methods and/or processes described herein. The CPU(s) 706 may each include one or more cores (e.g., one, two, four, eight, twenty-eight, seventy-two, etc.) that are capable of handling a multitude of software threads simultaneously. The CPU(s) 706 may include any type of processor, and may include different types of processors depending on the type of computing device 700 implemented (e.g., processors with fewer cores for mobile devices and processors with more cores for servers). For example, depending on the type of computing device 700, the processor may be an Advanced RISC Machines (ARM) processor implemented using Reduced Instruction Set Computing (RISC) or an x86 processor implemented using Complex Instruction Set Computing (CISC). The computing device 700 may include one or more CPUs 706 in addition to one or more microprocessors or supplementary co-processors, such as math co-processors.

In addition to or alternatively from the CPU(s) 706, the GPU(s) 708 may be configured to execute at least some of the computer-readable instructions to control one or more components of the computing device 700 to perform one or more of the methods and/or processes described herein. One or more of the GPU(s) 708 may be an integrated GPU (e.g., with one or more of the CPU(s) 706 and/or one or more of the GPU(s) 708 may be a discrete GPU. In embodiments, one or more of the GPU(s) 708 may be a coprocessor of one or more of the CPU(s) 706. The GPU(s) 708 may be used by the computing device 700 to render graphics (e.g., 3D graphics) or perform general purpose computations. For example, the GPU(s) 708 may be used for General-Purpose computing on GPUs (GPGPU). The GPU(s) 708 may include hundreds or thousands of cores that are capable of handling hundreds or thousands of software threads simultaneously. The GPU(s) 708 may generate pixel data for output images in response to rendering commands (e.g., rendering commands from the CPU(s) 706 received via a host interface). The GPU(s) 708 may include graphics memory, such as display memory, for storing pixel data or any other suitable data, such as GPGPU data. The display memory may be included as part of the memory 704. The GPU(s) 708 may include two or more GPUs operating in parallel (e.g., via a link). The link may directly connect the GPUs (e.g., using NVLINK) or may connect the GPUs through a switch (e.g., using NVSwitch). When combined together, each GPU 708 may generate pixel data or GPGPU data for different portions of an output or for different outputs (e.g., a first GPU for a first image and a second GPU for a second image). Each GPU may include its own memory, or may share memory with other GPUs.

In addition to or alternatively from the CPU(s) 706 and/or the GPU(s) 708, the logic unit(s) 720 may be configured to execute at least some of the computer-readable instructions to control one or more components of the computing device 700 to perform one or more of the methods and/or processes described herein. In embodiments, the CPU(s) 706, the GPU(s) 708, and/or the logic unit(s) 720 may discretely or jointly perform any combination of the methods, processes and/or portions thereof. One or more of the logic units 720 may be part of and/or integrated in one or more of the CPU(s) 706 and/or the GPU(s) 708 and/or one or more of the logic units 720 may be discrete components or otherwise external to the CPU(s) 706 and/or the GPU(s) 708. In embodiments, one or more of the logic units 720 may be a coprocessor of one or more of the CPU(s) 706 and/or one or more of the GPU(s) 708.

Examples of the logic unit(s) 720 include one or more processing cores and/or components thereof, such as Data Processing Units (DPUs), Tensor Cores (TCs), Tensor Processing Units (TPUs), Pixel Visual Cores (PVCs), Vision Processing Units (VPUs), Graphics Processing Clusters (GPCs), Texture Processing Clusters (TPCs), Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs), Tree Traversal Units (TTUs), Artificial Intelligence Accelerators (AIAs), Deep Learning Accelerators (DLAs), Arithmetic-Logic Units (ALUs), Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Floating Point Units (FPUs), input/output (I/O) elements, peripheral component interconnect (PCI) or peripheral component interconnect express (PCIe) elements, and/or the like.

The communication interface 710 may include one or more receivers, transmitters, and/or transceivers that enable the computing device 700 to communicate with other computing devices via an electronic communication network, included wired and/or wireless communications. The communication interface 710 may include components and functionality to enable communication over any of a number of different networks, such as wireless networks (e.g., Wi-Fi, Z-Wave, Bluetooth, Bluetooth LE, ZigBee, etc.), wired networks (e.g., communicating over Ethernet or InfiniBand), low-power wide-area networks (e.g., LoRaWAN, SigFox, etc.), and/or the Internet. In one or more embodiments, logic unit(s) 720 and/or communication interface 710 may include one or more data processing units (DPUs) to transmit data received over a network and/or through interconnect system 702 directly to (e.g., a memory of) one or more GPU(s) 708.

The I/O ports 712 may enable the computing device 700 to be logically coupled to other devices including the I/O components 714, the presentation component(s) 718, and/or other components, some of which may be built in to (e.g., integrated in) the computing device 700. Illustrative I/O components 714 include a microphone, mouse, keyboard, joystick, game pad, game controller, satellite dish, scanner, printer, wireless device, etc. The I/O components 714 may provide a natural user interface (NUI) that processes air gestures, voice, or other physiological inputs generated by a user. In some instances, inputs may be transmitted to an appropriate network element for further processing. An NUI may implement any combination of speech recognition, stylus recognition, facial recognition, biometric recognition, gesture recognition both on screen and adjacent to the screen, air gestures, head and eye tracking, and touch recognition (as described in more detail below) associated with a display of the computing device 700. The computing device 700 may be include depth cameras, such as stereoscopic camera systems, infrared camera systems, RGB camera systems, touchscreen technology, and combinations of these, for gesture detection and recognition. Additionally, the computing device 700 may include accelerometers or gyroscopes (e.g., as part of an inertia measurement unit (IMU)) that enable detection of motion. In some examples, the output of the accelerometers or gyroscopes may be used by the computing device 700 to render immersive augmented reality or virtual reality.

The power supply 716 may include a hard-wired power supply, a battery power supply, or a combination thereof. The power supply 716 may provide power to the computing device 700 to enable the components of the computing device 700 to operate.

The presentation component(s) 718 may include a display (e.g., a monitor, a touch screen, a television screen, a heads-up-display (HUD), other display types, or a combination thereof), speakers, and/or other presentation components. The presentation component(s) 718 may receive data from other components (e.g., the GPU(s) 708, the CPU(s) 706, DPUs, etc.), and output the data (e.g., as an image, video, sound, etc.).

Example Data Center

FIG. 8 illustrates an example data center 800 that may be used in at least one embodiments of the present disclosure. The data center 800 may include a data center infrastructure layer 810, a framework layer 820, a software layer 830, and/or an application layer 840.

As shown in FIG. 8, the data center infrastructure layer 810 may include a resource orchestrator 812, grouped computing resources 814, and node computing resources (“node C.R.s”) 816(1)-816(N), where “N” represents any whole, positive integer. In at least one embodiment, node C.R.s 816(1)-816(N) may include, but are not limited to, any number of central processing units (CPUs) or other processors (including DPUs, accelerators, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), graphics processors or graphics processing units (GPUs), etc.), memory devices (e.g., dynamic read-only memory), storage devices (e.g., solid state or disk drives), network input/output (NW I/O) devices, network switches, virtual machines (VMs), power modules, and/or cooling modules, etc. In some embodiments, one or more node C.R.s from among node C.R.s 816(1)-816(N) may correspond to a server having one or more of the above-mentioned computing resources. In addition, in some embodiments, the node C.R.s 816(1)-8161(N) may include one or more virtual components, such as vGPUs, vCPUs, and/or the like, and/or one or more of the node C.R.s 816(1)-816(N) may correspond to a virtual machine (VM).

In at least one embodiment, grouped computing resources 814 may include separate groupings of node C.R.s 816 housed within one or more racks (not shown), or many racks housed in data centers at various geographical locations (also not shown). Separate groupings of node C.R.s 816 within grouped computing resources 814 may include grouped compute, network, memory or storage resources that may be configured or allocated to support one or more workloads. In at least one embodiment, several node C.R.s 816 including CPUs, GPUs, DPUs, and/or other processors may be grouped within one or more racks to provide compute resources to support one or more workloads. The one or more racks may also include any number of power modules, cooling modules, and/or network switches, in any combination.

The resource orchestrator 812 may configure or otherwise control one or more node C.R.s 816(1)-816(N) and/or grouped computing resources 814. In at least one embodiment, resource orchestrator 812 may include a software design infrastructure (SDI) management entity for the data center 800. The resource orchestrator 812 may include hardware, software, or some combination thereof.

In at least one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 8, framework layer 820 may include a job scheduler 832, a configuration manager 834, a resource manager 836, and/or a distributed file system 838. The framework layer 820 may include a framework to support software 832 of software layer 830 and/or one or more application(s) 842 of application layer 840. The software 832 or application(s) 842 may respectively include web-based service software or applications, such as those provided by Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure. The framework layer 820 may be, but is not limited to, a type of free and open-source software web application framework such as Apache Spark™ (hereinafter “Spark”) that may utilize distributed file system 838 for large-scale data processing (e.g., “big data”). In at least one embodiment, job scheduler 832 may include a Spark driver to facilitate scheduling of workloads supported by various layers of data center 800. The configuration manager 834 may be capable of configuring different layers such as software layer 830 and framework layer 820 including Spark and distributed file system 838 for supporting large-scale data processing. The resource manager 836 may be capable of managing clustered or grouped computing resources mapped to or allocated for support of distributed file system 838 and job scheduler 832. In at least one embodiment, clustered or grouped computing resources may include grouped computing resource 814 at data center infrastructure layer 810. The resource manager 836 may coordinate with resource orchestrator 812 to manage these mapped or allocated computing resources.

In at least one embodiment, software 832 included in software layer 830 may include software used by at least portions of node C.R.s 816(1)-816(N), grouped computing resources 814, and/or distributed file system 838 of framework layer 820. One or more types of software may include, but are not limited to, Internet web page search software, e-mail virus scan software, database software, and streaming video content software.

In at least one embodiment, application(s) 842 included in application layer 840 may include one or more types of applications used by at least portions of node C.R.s 816(1)-816(N), grouped computing resources 814, and/or distributed file system 838 of framework layer 820. One or more types of applications may include, but are not limited to, any number of a genomics application, a cognitive compute, and a machine learning application, including training or inferencing software, machine learning framework software (e.g., PyTorch, TensorFlow, Caffe, etc.), and/or other machine learning applications used in conjunction with one or more embodiments.

In at least one embodiment, any of configuration manager 834, resource manager 836, and resource orchestrator 812 may implement any number and type of self-modifying actions based on any amount and type of data acquired in any technically feasible fashion. Self-modifying actions may relieve a data center operator of data center 800 from making possibly bad configuration decisions and possibly avoiding underutilized and/or poor performing portions of a data center.

The data center 800 may include tools, services, software or other resources to train one or more machine learning models or predict or infer information using one or more machine learning models according to one or more embodiments described herein. For example, a machine learning model(s) may be trained by calculating weight parameters according to a neural network architecture using software and/or computing resources described above with respect to the data center 800. In at least one embodiment, trained or deployed machine learning models corresponding to one or more neural networks may be used to infer or predict information using resources described above with respect to the data center 800 by using weight parameters calculated through one or more training techniques, such as but not limited to those described herein.

In at least one embodiment, the data center 800 may use CPUs, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), GPUs, FPGAs, and/or other hardware (or virtual compute resources corresponding thereto) to perform training and/or inferencing using above-described resources. Moreover, one or more software and/or hardware resources described above may be configured as a service to allow users to train or performing inferencing of information, such as image recognition, speech recognition, or other artificial intelligence services.

Example Network Environments

Network environments suitable for use in implementing embodiments of the disclosure may include one or more client devices, servers, network attached storage (NAS), other backend devices, and/or other device types. The client devices, servers, and/or other device types (e.g., each device) may be implemented on one or more instances of the computing device(s) 700 of FIG. 7—e.g., each device may include similar components, features, and/or functionality of the computing device(s) 700. In addition, where backend devices (e.g., servers, NAS, etc.) are implemented, the backend devices may be included as part of a data center 800, an example of which is described in more detail herein with respect to FIG. 8.

Components of a network environment may communicate with each other via a network(s), which may be wired, wireless, or both. The network may include multiple networks, or a network of networks. By way of example, the network may include one or more Wide Area Networks (WANs), one or more Local Area Networks (LANs), one or more public networks such as the Internet and/or a public switched telephone network (PSTN), and/or one or more private networks. Where the network includes a wireless telecommunications network, components such as a base station, a communications tower, or even access points (as well as other components) may provide wireless connectivity.

Compatible network environments may include one or more peer-to-peer network environments—in which case a server may not be included in a network environment—and one or more client-server network environments—in which case one or more servers may be included in a network environment. In peer-to-peer network environments, functionality described herein with respect to a server(s) may be implemented on any number of client devices.

In at least one embodiment, a network environment may include one or more cloud-based network environments, a distributed computing environment, a combination thereof, etc. A cloud-based network environment may include a framework layer, a job scheduler, a resource manager, and a distributed file system implemented on one or more of servers, which may include one or more core network servers and/or edge servers. A framework layer may include a framework to support software of a software layer and/or one or more application(s) of an application layer. The software or application(s) may respectively include web-based service software or applications. In embodiments, one or more of the client devices may use the web-based service software or applications (e.g., by accessing the service software and/or applications via one or more application programming interfaces (APIs)). The framework layer may be, but is not limited to, a type of free and open-source software web application framework such as that may use a distributed file system for large-scale data processing (e.g., “big data”).

A cloud-based network environment may provide cloud computing and/or cloud storage that carries out any combination of computing and/or data storage functions described herein (or one or more portions thereof). Any of these various functions may be distributed over multiple locations from central or core servers (e.g., of one or more data centers that may be distributed across a state, a region, a country, the globe, etc.). If a connection to a user (e.g., a client device) is relatively close to an edge server(s), a core server(s) may designate at least a portion of the functionality to the edge server(s). A cloud-based network environment may be private (e.g., limited to a single organization), may be public (e.g., available to many organizations), and/or a combination thereof (e.g., a hybrid cloud environment).

The client device(s) may include at least some of the components, features, and functionality of the example computing device(s) 700 described herein with respect to FIG. 7. By way of example and not limitation, a client device may be embodied as a Personal Computer (PC), a laptop computer, a mobile device, a smartphone, a tablet computer, a smart watch, a wearable computer, a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), an MP3 player, a virtual reality headset, a Global Positioning System (GPS) or device, a video player, a video camera, a surveillance device or system, a vehicle, a boat, a flying vessel, a virtual machine, a drone, a robot, a handheld communications device, a hospital device, a gaming device or system, an entertainment system, a vehicle computer system, an embedded system controller, a remote control, an appliance, a consumer electronic device, a workstation, an edge device, any combination of these delineated devices, or any other suitable device.

The disclosure may be described in the general context of computer code or machine-useable instructions, including computer-executable instructions such as program modules, being executed by a computer or other machine, such as a personal data assistant or other handheld device. Generally, program modules including routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., refer to code that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The disclosure may be practiced in a variety of system configurations, including hand-held devices, consumer electronics, general-purpose computers, more specialty computing devices, etc. The disclosure may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote-processing devices that are linked through a communications network.

As used herein, a recitation of “and/or” with respect to two or more elements should be interpreted to mean only one element, or a combination of elements. For example, “element A, element B, and/or element C” may include only element A, only element B, only element C, element A and element B, element A and element C, element B and element C, or elements A, B, and C. In addition, “at least one of element A or element B” may include at least one of element A, at least one of element B, or at least one of element A and at least one of element B. Further, “at least one of element A and element B” may include at least one of element A, at least one of element B, or at least one of element A and at least one of element B.

The subject matter of the present disclosure is described with specificity herein to meet statutory requirements. However, the description itself is not intended to limit the scope of this disclosure. Rather, the inventors have contemplated that the claimed subject matter might also be embodied in other ways, to include different steps or combinations of steps similar to the ones described in this document, in conjunction with other present or future technologies. Moreover, although the terms “step” and/or “block” may be used herein to connote different elements of methods employed, the terms should not be interpreted as implying any particular order among or between various steps herein disclosed unless and except when the order of individual steps is explicitly described. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A processor comprising: one or more circuits to: receive ground truth data and perception data, the perception data generated based at least in part on one or more machine learning models processing sensor data captured at a time corresponding to the ground truth data; compute, based at least in part on a first forward simulation using the ground truth data, one or more first outputs; compute, based at least in part on a second forward simulation using the perception data, one or more second outputs; determine whether a fault is present based at least in part on comparing the one or more first outputs to the one or more second outputs; and compute one or more key performance indicators (KPIs) based at least in part on the determination of whether the fault is present.
 2. The processor of claim 1, wherein the ground truth data corresponds to ground truth information associated with the sensor data.
 3. The processor of claim 1, wherein the first forward simulation and the second forward simulation are executed using a simulation of a control model, the control model corresponding to at least one of a collision detection feature, a feature of an advanced driver assistance system (ADAS), a behavior planner, a path planner, a control component, or an actuation component.
 4. The processor of claim 1, wherein the one or more KPIs include at least one of mean distance between failures (MDBF) or mean time between failures (MTBF).
 5. The processor of claim 1, wherein the one or more first outputs include a ground truth control image, the one or more second outputs include a perception estimation control image, and the one or more circuits are further to: generate a comparison control image based at least in part on the comparison of the one or more first outputs to the one or more second outputs, wherein the determination of whether the fault is present is based at least in part on analyzing one or more pixels of the comparison control image.
 6. The processor of claim 5, wherein the analyzing the one or more pixels includes comparing a number of pixels having a predefined pixel value to a threshold number of pixels, wherein the fault is determined to be present when the number of pixels exceeds the threshold number of pixels.
 7. The processor of claim 1, wherein the perception data is representative of at least one of bounding shapes corresponding to objects, velocities corresponding to the objects, or distances to the objects as computed using the one or more machine learning models, and the ground truth data is representative of at least one of ground truth bounding shapes corresponding to the objects, ground truth velocities corresponding to the objects, or ground truth distances corresponding to the objects.
 8. The processor of claim 1, wherein the one or more machine learning models include one or more deep neural networks (DNNs).
 9. The processor of claim 1, wherein the processor is comprised in at least one of: a control system for an autonomous or semi-autonomous machine; a perception system for an autonomous or semi-autonomous machine; a system for performing simulation operations; a system for performing deep learning operations; a system implemented using an edge device; a system implemented using a robot; a system incorporating one or more virtual machines (VMs); a system implemented at least partially in a data center; or a system implemented at least partially using cloud computing resources.
 10. A system comprising: one or more sensors; one or more processing units; and one or more memory units storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processing units, cause the one or more processing units to execute operations comprising: performing a first simulation using perception data generated using one or more machine learning models and based at least on part on first sensor data generated using the one or more sensors; performing a second simulation using ground truth data generated based at least on part on at least one of the first sensor data or second sensor data generated using the one or more sensors; comparing one or more first outputs generated from the first simulation to one or more second outputs generated from the second simulation; detecting whether one or more faults are present based at least in part on the comparing; and evaluating a performance of the one or more machine learning models based at least in part on the detecting whether the one or more faults are present.
 11. The system of claim 10, further comprising updating or retraining the one or more machine learning models based at least in part on the evaluating the performance.
 12. The system of claim 10, wherein the evaluating the performance includes computing one or more key performance indicators (KPIs), the one or more KPIs including at least one of mean distance between failures (MDBF) or mean time between failures (MTBF).
 13. The system of claim 10, wherein the ground truth data corresponds to ground truth information associated with the first sensor data.
 14. The system of claim 10, wherein the first forward simulation and the second forward simulation are executed using a simulation of a control model, the control model corresponding to at least one of a collision detection feature, a feature of an advanced driver assistance system (ADAS), a behavior planner, a path planner, a control component, or an actuation component.
 15. The system of claim 10, wherein the one or more first outputs include a ground truth control image, the one or more second outputs include a perception estimation control image, and the one or more operations further include: generating a comparison control image based at least in part on the comparing the ground truth control image to the perception estimation control image, wherein the detecting whether the one or more faults are present is based at least in part on analyzing pixels of the comparison control image.
 16. The system of claim 15, wherein the analyzing the pixels includes comparing a number of pixels having a predefined pixel value to a threshold number of pixels, wherein the fault is detected when the number of pixels exceeds the threshold number of pixels.
 17. The system of claim 10, wherein the perception data is representative of at least one of bounding shapes corresponding to objects, velocities corresponding to the objects, or distances to the objects as computed using the one or more machine learning models, and the ground truth data is representative of at least one of ground truth bounding shapes corresponding to the objects, ground truth velocities corresponding to the objects, or ground truth distances corresponding to the objects.
 18. The system of claim 10, wherein the one or more machine learning models include one or more deep neural networks (DNNs).
 19. The system of claim 10, wherein the system is comprised in at least one of: a control system for an autonomous or semi-autonomous machine; a perception system for an autonomous or semi-autonomous machine; a system for performing simulation operations; a system for performing deep learning operations; a system implemented using an edge device; a system implemented using a robot; a system incorporating one or more virtual machines (VMs); a system implemented at least partially in a data center; or a system implemented at least partially using cloud computing resources.
 20. A method comprising: performing a first simulation of a control model using perception data generated using one or more machine learning models and based at least on part on first sensor data generated using one or more first sensors; performing a second simulation of the control model using ground truth data generated based at least on part on at least one of the first sensor data or second sensor data generated using one or more second sensors; comparing one or more first outputs generated from the first simulation to one or more second outputs generated from the second simulation; detecting whether one or more faults are present based at least in part on the comparing; and evaluating a performance of the one or more machine learning models based at least in part on the detecting whether the one or more faults are present.
 21. The method of claim 20, further comprising updating or retraining the one or more machine learning models based at least in part on the evaluating the performance.
 22. The method of claim 20, wherein the evaluating the performance includes computing one or more key performance indicators (KPIs), the one or more KPIs including at least one of mean distance between failures (MDBF) or mean time between failures (MTBF).
 23. The method of claim 20, wherein the ground truth data corresponds to ground truth information associated with the first sensor data.
 24. The method of claim 20, wherein the control model corresponds to at least one of a collision detection feature, a feature of an advanced driver assistance system (ADAS), a behavior planner, a path planner, a control component, or an actuation component.
 25. The method of claim 20, wherein the one or more first outputs include a ground truth control image, the one or more second outputs include a perception estimation control image, and the method further comprises: generating a comparison control image based at least in part on the comparing the ground truth control image to the perception estimation control image, wherein the detecting whether the one or more faults are present is based at least in part on analyzing pixels of the comparison control image.
 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the analyzing the pixels includes comparing a number of pixels having a predefined pixel value to a threshold number of pixels, wherein the fault is detected when the number of pixels exceeds the threshold number of pixels.
 27. The method of claim 20, wherein the perception data is representative of at least one of bounding shapes corresponding to objects, velocities corresponding to the objects, or distances to the objects as computed using the one or more machine learning models, and the ground truth data is representative of at least one of ground truth bounding shapes corresponding to the objects, ground truth velocities corresponding to the objects, or ground truth distances corresponding to the objects.
 28. The method of claim 20, wherein the one or more machine learning models include one or more deep neural networks (DNNs).
 29. The method of claim 20, wherein the ground truth data is generated based at least in part on fusing sensor data from one or more sensor types.
 30. The method of claim 20, wherein the perception data is generated using the first sensor data from a first sensor type and the ground truth data is generate using the second sensor data from a second sensor type different from the first sensor type. 